
Regulation Policy | |
NCPA Brief Analysis: Regulatory Improvement act |
A first step in the reform of the federal regulatory process would be passage of the
Regulatory Improvement Act of 1997, says environmental policy analyst H. Sterling
Burnett of the National Center for Policy Analysis. This bill, sponsored by Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) and Sen. Carl Levin (D-
Mich.), would require regulatory agencies to publicly disclose certain types of information
before implementing major regulations -- those with an economic impact of more than a
$100 million. Supporters of the bill argue that costly, ineffective and even harmful federal
regulations are increasingly pervasive. Studies have found that in 1994 alone, businesses
and individuals spent more than $6,000 per household in higher costs for goods and
services and spending resources on compliance and paperwork (see figure). Based on the public's right to know how and why regulations are formulated, the bill
would require three types of information to be gathered and publicly disclosed before
regulations become effective.
Cost-benefit analysis would enable people to compare various options, all of which may be beneficial in some way but not all of which can be simultaneously undertaken. And by making the science transparent, the legislation hopes to head off the kinds of acrimonious charges made about recent clean air regulations. Source: H. Sterling Burnett, "Regulating the Regulators: The 1997 Regulatory Improvement Act," Brief Analysis No. 258, March 2, 1998, National Center for Policy Analysis, 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800, Dallas, Texas 75251, (972) 386- 6272. |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA