
Is there a need for additional nursing home care for the elderly? ThatÌs not clear. For every elderly person in a nursing home, two otherÛequally disabledÛelderly people are not. This situation reflects the fact that, when people are forced to pay with their own money, many find cheaper options. Nursing home care costs about $25,000 a year, in part owing to government regulations that require most nursing homes to be structurally safer than the average Hilton hotel. For the most part, Medicaid patients in nursing homes cannot take the money spent on their behalf and try to find the same care for a lower price. As with other parts of the health care sector, the system is not designed to help patients find a good deal for a reasonable price. Rather, it is designed to funnel billions of dollars into nursing homes.
There is very little private insurance for nursing home care. And many policies that look like insurance on the surface are actually disguised savings plans. One reason is that it is extremely difficult to construct objective definitions of the circumstance under which nursing home care is indicated. Entry into a nursing home requires a physicianÌs statement that the treatment is necessary, but physicians often base their judgments, not on the patientÌs medical condition, but on family preferences. Nursing home care very often is a choice about living arrangements rather than a medical necessity. Another reason for the lack of long-term care insurance is federal tax policy, which creates tax subsidies for health insurance for current medical expenses but disallows tax deductions for premiums for future medical expenses. Savings or insurance premiums for future medical expenses must be paid with aftertax dollars.
There is no question that if nursing home care were provided free to the elderly, the demand would soar. Some estimate the additional cost at $60 billion a year, but it could be much higher. If every elderly person spent one year in a nursing home, the total cost would be about $627 billion per year.
The Clinton administration wants to repeal a new law which makes it a federal crime for individuals to dispose of their assets in order to qualify for Medicaid coverage of nursing home expenses. Officials claim that such abuses were not common; however,
Under the law, a person who "knowingly and willfully disposes of assets" in order to become eligible for Medicaid may be fined $10,000 and imprisoned for one year. In general, a person will not be subject to criminal penalties if he or she gives away assets more than three years before applying for Medicaid.
Source: Robert Pear, "Repeal Urged for Law on Giving Away Assets," New York Times, February 18, 1997.
The cost of long-term care is the principal reason for poverty among the elderly, reports the American Health Care Association, a group of nursing home care providers. An AHCA study points out that insurance is available for nursing and home health care, but many people fail to insure against the need.
Many people mistakenly assume Medicare or their health insurance plans will pay for long term care. But Medicare pays only for limited nursing home stays after hospitalizations and requires a substantial copayment.
Two out of three nursing home residents, about one million people, now rely on Medicaid to pay for their care. However, in order to qualify for Medicaid, patients must first spend themselves into poverty, and then the benefit per day is limited. Instead, elderly Americans are increasingly purchasing long-term care insurance.
Source: "Long Term Care Insurance: Debunking the Myths," Background, July 17, 1996, American Health Care Association.
For the full text of the NCPA Brief Analysis on Nursing Home Care go to http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba190.html
Home health care, primarily home visits by nurses and health aides, is one of the fastest-growing categories of Medicare expenditures. While home visits were intended to ease the transition from hospital care, it is most frequently used as a form of long-term care for chronic conditions, according to a new study.
By examining Medicare claims data for 1993, researchers determined that:
The researchers found no evidence that home health care was substituted for hospital care. For instance, those urban areas with higher rates of home health care did not have fewer hospital admissions or shorter lengths of stay. However, other evidence suggests that home care may lower hospital costs for severely disabled veterans and elderly patients with congestive heart failure.
Medicare reimbursements for home health care grew from $2 billion in 1988 to $12.7 billion in 1994 and now account for more than 8 percent of Medicare's total budget. This growth was mostly the result of more liberal rules and standardized coverage for home care in 1988 and 1989. Medicare does not cover long-term institutional care, such as in nursing homes, but Medicaid and some private insurers do.
Source: H. Gilbert Welch et al., "The Use of Medicare Home Health
Care Services," New England Journal of Medicine, August 1, 1996.
In this year's health insurance reform bill, Congress clamped down on the practice some elderly people had engaged in of giving away their savings to relatives so they could qualify for Medicaid. That will become a crime as of January 1st.
Nevertheless, some are advocating doing away with the law. Others advise seniors to plan ahead by buying long-term care insurance rather than depending on Medicaid. The average price of a basic policy that pays $100 a day for four years is $400 a year for a 50-year-old, $1,100 for a 65-year-old and $4,500 for a 79-year-old.
Source: Anne Willette, "Law Puts Twist Into Medicaid Disability," USA Today, November 25, 1996.
Nearly a year after Congress passed new tax breaks for long-term care insurance, the insurance industry is divided and consumers are reportedly more confused than ever.
That doesn't necessarily mean that nonqualified policies are certain to face the tax ax, but the act is silent on the matter and the Treasury Department hasn't ruled on it. Consequently, no one knows whether such policies will or won't be taxed.
Experts say that while potential buyers could just go ahead and select a tax-qualified policy, that may not be the best type of coverage for them. To collect benefits under a tax-qualified policy, a person must be unable to perform two out of six -- or in some cases two out of five -- "activities of daily living." Those activities are eating, bathing, dressing, transferring from a bed to a chair, toileting and continence. A professional must certify that a person will have those disabilities for at least 90 days.
Nonqualified policies are more lenient in their coverage: they don't have the 90-day disability minimum, may include the inability to walk among the disabilities, and may cover care when a physician certifies "medical necessity."
Due to the uncertainty and confusion, some insurers will let those who buy nonqualified policies swap them for qualified coverage -- and vice-versa -- depending on how the Treasury eventually rules. But Treasury may not have an answer any time soon. "We are considering how we could resolve this large and very difficult question," an official says.
Source: Nancy Ann Jeffery, "Tax Rule on Long-Term Care Insurance Generate New Headaches for Consumers," Wall Street Journal, November 7, 1997.
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact UsDallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA