Permanent Tax Cuts
November 25, 2002
Economist Milton Friedman proved 40 years ago that people's spending is mainly a function of what they view as their permanent income.
- When they have temporary income gains, they tend to save them; when they have temporary losses, they borrow or draw down saving to compensate.
- Therefore, consumer spending will not automatically rise just because people have a one-time gain of a few extra dollars.
- More likely, they will just save the money or pay down debt, which is the same thing.
Studies of last year's $300 per person tax rebate confirm his research.
- The theory was that the tax rebate would boost spending and raise growth.
- Actually, only about 20 percent was spent and the rest saved or used to pay debt, according to consumer surveys by University of Michigan economists Matthew Shapiro and Joel Slemrod.
- Overall, there was virtually no change in consumer expenditures.
Permanent tax cuts will have more impact on spending today than a rebate of larger size. Thus, making last year's tax rate reductions permanent will increase spending more than give-away rebates.
And any serious effort to revive growth would better focus on investment, not consumer spending -- which has actually held up quite well all throughout the economic slowdown.
- Since the beginning of last year, personal consumption expenditures have risen 4.5 percent and government consumption has gone up by 5.9 percent.
- It is only because gross private domestic investment has fallen by 4.8 percent that the gross domestic product is up by just 2.5 percent.
Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, November 25, 2002.
Browse more articles on Tax and Spending Issues