The Faults of Federal Deposit Insurance
March 26, 2003
Depression-weary Americans hailed President Franklin Roosevelt when he signed federal deposit insurance into law just three months into has presidency. Over the years the ceiling on the amount of deposits covered has risen and in 1980 it was increased from $40,000 to $100,000 per account.
Now a plan is afoot to raise the ceiling again to $130,000 -- and to $260,000 for retirement accounts. The argument is that inflation has eroded the value of the current limit.
Although Americans take comfort in the added security of federally insured accounts, the program certainly carries risks to taxpayers -- significant downsides which are too often ignored, economists point out.
- In the 1980s, confident that the government would stand behind even the shakiest institutions, investors deposited $100,000 in savings-and-loans that offered high interest rates -- a sure bet they were making risky loans.
- Then came the savings-and-loan mess and American taxpayers were on the hook for billions of dollars.
Experts say that federal deposit insurance is an expensive subsidy for poorly managed banks. For example, when the federal government closed the Phoenix-based NextBank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation had to shell out $525 million to cover accounts containing $100,000 each. It isn't clear how much it will recover from selling bank assets.
But if the government had been insuring $130,000 accounts, the charge to taxpayers would have been even bigger.
Source: David Wessel, "Capital: A Solution in Search of a Problem," March 14, 2002, Wall Street Journal.
Browse more articles on Government Issues