A Reason to Relocate
November 5, 2003
Estate planners are wielding a new piece of advice to reduce clients' death taxes: Move to another state.
Federal taxes on estates were eased under the Economic Growth & Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, but the law also had the effect of reducing tax revenue to states. As a result, many states have been rewriting their own tax codes to make up for the shortfalls.
So far, at least a dozen states have pulled out of the federal system and have adopted their own rules, a process known as decoupling. Others have taken equally drastic steps, like freezing their laws to sometime before EGTRRA was enacted. Now, though, the differences can have a big financial impact:
- If you live in New York, for example, you could face a combined federal and state estate-tax rate of 60 percent in 2004.
- But pack up the U-Haul and set up house in Nevada and you'll pay a 48 percent rate.
- If you live in Illinois with a $25 million estate, your heirs will likely pay $1.73 million more if you die there than if you moved to Florida in 2003; the difference rises to a high of $2.6 million in 2004.
There are other strategies being bandied about to deal with the changing estate-tax landscape. For example, anyone who owns property in a state with a high estate-tax rate may consider converting that property into a limited liability partnership to shield it from that state's death taxes. But nothing works as well as moving, say estate planners.
Source: Kaja Whitehouse, "A Reason to Relocate: Death Taxes: Burden for Heirs Depends On Where You Live or Die As States Rewrite Rules," Wall Street Journal, November 5, 2003.
For text (WSJ subscription required)
Browse more articles on Tax and Spending Issues