ADMISSION FEES: AN EFFICIENT WAY TO FUND NATION'S PARKS
July 6, 2004
In 1996, the U.S. Congress authorized the use of fees by public land managers in select areas to provide supplemental funding -- a pilot program that is set to expire in October 2004. According to J. Bishop Grewell, a researcher with the Property & Environment Research Center (PERC), the new fees effectively raise money to maintain the nation's parks without hurting low-income earners:
- In 2002, the program allowed the National Park Service to complete 136 deferred maintenance projects.
- That same year, admission fees funded the repairs of 47 mile of trails in Washington State's Olympic National Forest, after maintenance of the trails had been deferred for eight years.
- Recreational fees have helped reduce vandalism, litter, and crime on public lands.
Fees also have the potential to reduce congestion problems by offering lower rates on weekdays and during off-peak recreational periods. Nevertheless, some have criticized the new fees on the grounds of fairness, justice and morality. Grewell dismisses such concerns:
- By far the greatest hurdle to low-income visitors is the cost associated with traveling to a site and buying the goods necessary for recreation, not small admission fees.
- If concerns persist, recreation vouchers could be offered to the poor as well as providing a limited number of free admission tickets on a first-come, first-serve basis.
- Worries about commercialization through park fees ignore the fact that public lands already are commercial -- one noteworthy example is Yellowstone National Park.
- Fees increase accountability of land managers to park visitors, while reliance on federal funding tends to promote more "congressionally identified" initiatives rather than projects recommended by on-the-ground park personnel.
Source: J. Bishop Grewell, "Recreation Fees -- Four Philosophical Questions," Property & Environment Research Center, PERC Policy Series No. PS-31, June 2004.
Browse more articles on Environment Issues