Small Banks Hurt by Dodd-Frank
January 14, 2015
Dodd-Frank hit banks and financial firms with a host of new regulations, but lawmakers in the new Congress have indicated an intention to reform the massive law. Ike Brannon, writing for the American Enterprise Institute, says that's a good idea, explaining that large banks are better off than small banking institutions under the rules. Why?
- Because big banks are larger, they can more easily spread out the regulatory costs than can small banks, whose Dodd-Frank costs constitute a much larger proportion of their overall costs.
- The federal government's "too big to fail" policy sent a message to investors that the government is willing to bail out large banks, making larger institutions more attractive.
According to Brannon, Dodd-Frank created another problem: while large banks have more money to lend, they are less knowledgeable about people in small communities, so they tend only to offer safe loans. Brannon says would-be entrepreneurs in those towns must turn to community banks, which now have less money available for lending.
What's the solution? Brannon says Congress should require financial regulations to undergo cost-benefit analysis. Additionally, he suggests making two tiers of financial regulations so that regulations directed at large institutions aren't also imposed on small community banks.
Source: Ike Brannon, "Congress should help small communities by amending the Dodd-Frank Act," American Enterprise Institute, January 6, 2015.
Browse more articles on Economic Issues