Everything You Know About Education Is Wrong
December 14, 2011
Think of the ingredients that make for a good school. Small classes. Well-educated teachers. Plenty of funding. Combine, mix well, then bake. Turns out, your recipe would be horribly wrong, at least according to a new working paper out of Harvard. Its take away: Schools shouldn't focus on resources. They should focus on culture, says Jordan Weissmann, an associate editor at The Atlantic.
The study comes courtesy of economist Roland Fryer and PhD candidate Will Dobbie.
- Fryer gathered extensive data from 35 New York City charter schools, which generally cater to underprivileged and minority communities.
- He interviewed students, principals and teachers, reviewing lesson plans and watching classroom video, to try and pinpoint factors that correlated with higher test scores.
His findings could add some new fire to the debate about what makes a good school.
- Fryer found that class size, per-pupil spending and the number of teachers with certifications or advanced degrees had nothing to do with student test scores in language and math.
- In fact, schools that poured in more resources actually got worse results.
What did make a difference? The study measures correlation, not causation, so there are no clear answers. But there is a clear pattern. Schools that focused on teacher development, data-driven instruction, creating a culture focused on student achievement and setting high academic expectations consistently fared better. The results were consistent whether the charter's program was geared towards the creative arts or hard-core behavioral discipline.
Source: Jordan Weissmann, "Everything You Know About Education Is Wrong," The Atlantic, December 9, 2011. Will Dobbie, Roland G. Fryer, Jr, "Getting Beneath the Veil of Effective Schools: Evidence from New York City," National Bureau of Economic Research, December 2011.
Browse more articles on Education Issues