Has the Shift to Managed Care Reduced Medicaid Expenditures?
August 8, 2011
From 1991 to 2003, the fraction of Medicaid recipients enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and other forms of Medicaid managed care increased from 11 percent to 58 percent. This increase was largely driven by state and local mandates that required most Medicaid recipients to enroll in a Medicaid managed care plan, according to Mark Duggan and Tamara Hayford, researchers with the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Theoretically, it is ambiguous whether the shift from fee-for-service into managed care would lead to an increase or a reduction in Medicaid spending. Duggan and Hayford investigate this effect using a data set on state and local level managed care mandates and detailed data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service on state Medicaid expenditures.
- The findings suggest that shifting Medicaid recipients from fee-for-service into managed care did not reduce Medicaid spending in the typical state.
- However, the effects of the shift varied significantly across states as a function of the generosity of the state's baseline Medicaid provider reimbursement rates.
- These results are consistent with recent research on managed care among the privately insured, which finds that HMOs and other forms of managed care achieve their savings largely through reduced prices rather than lower quantities.
Source: Mark Duggan and Tamara Hayford, "Has the Shift to Managed Care Reduced Medicaid Expenditures? Evidence from State and Local-Level Mandates," National Bureau of Economic Research, July 2011.
Browse more articles on Health Issues