A Better Way to Frack?

May 23, 2011

The innovation that has unlocked vast new reserves of natural gas is a process known as hydrofracking --or fracking for short -- in which horizontal drilling is combined with blasts of pressurized water and sand.  But for critics, the natural gas unlocked by fracking may come at too great a cost, says Ronald Bailey, Reason Magazine's science correspondent.

The biggest, most headline-grabbing fear is that fracking chemicals will contaminate drinking water.  Luckily, there may be a technical fix that addresses these water worries and does an end run around drilling opponents: gas-fracking.

  • Developed by GasFrac Energy Services in Alberta, Canada, gas-fracking uses liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), which consists mostly of propane, instead of water to crack open shale formations to release oil and natural gas.
  • The company produces an LPG gel using phosphate esters, iron sulfate activator and magnesium oxide.
  • None are seriously toxic or are thought to be carcinogenic.
  • The injected LPG gel combined with sand fractures shale formations to release trapped oil and/or natural gas.

So far the evidence suggests that the worst fears about hydrofracking appear to be considerably exaggerated by opponents of natural gas drilling.  Nevertheless, a technology like gas-fracking may be just what the clean energy proponents are looking for, says Bailey.

Source: Ronald Bailey, "A Better Way to Frack?" Reason Magazine, May 17, 2011.

For text:

http://reason.com/archives/2011/05/17/a-better-way-to-frack

 

Browse more articles on Environment Issues