Solar Power Is Safer, but Is It Viable?
March 17, 2011
Japan's nuclear crisis has boosted a solar sector which faces chronic oversupply. Solar cheerleaders will be heartened particularly by Germany's shutdown of several nuclear power plants, since that country accounted for 40 percent of solar installations over the past two years, according to Credit Suisse estimates, says the Wall Street Journal.
Solar power is safer but it cannot replace nuclear energy.
- In 2008, nuclear plants generated 13.5 percent of the world's electricity, according to the International Energy Agency.
- Solar power accounted for 0.06 percent.
This understates the investment in solar power required to fill the gap, however, because nuclear plants run most of the time while solar power is intermittent by definition.
- In 2008, nuclear plants globally generated 80 percent of their total potential output.
- Solar units eked out 9 percent.
Solar power also remains relatively expensive.
- U.S. government projections for new plants entering service in 2016 put the total cost for electricity from solar photovoltaic units at nearly double the projected cost of new nuclear plants in 2009 dollars.
- Even if the latter now rise, solar power must compete with other fuels, most notably cheap natural gas.
- Those same government projections put the cost of electricity from modern gas-fired units at just 30 percent the cost of solar power.
Politically, gas faces its own problems, given concerns over shale drilling. But then solar power's higher costs and subsidies are also a political issue in these straitened times, which is why governments have been reining in incentives. Japan's tragedy could persuade them to cut the solar power industry some slack. But natural gas's better economics and reliability should make it the biggest beneficiary, says the Journal.
Source: Liam Denning, "After Japan Quake, Gas Should Eclipse Solar," Wall Street Journal, March 16, 2011.
Browse more articles on Environment Issues