Net Neutrality: Job-Killing Zombie
November 2, 2010
Politician swear they are laser-focused on creating job, but it is seemingly impossible to kill wrong-headed policies that undercut growth and jobs, say Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, and Sam Batkins, the coordinator of regulatory issues at American Action Forum.
For two examples, consider health care reform and net neutrality.
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act had more funerals than Tom Sawyer -- but the legislation nonetheless became law, despite the dire policy implications for jobs, federal spending and health care.
- Costly new regulatory burdens on business, higher insurance costs for employers and $500 billion in new taxes are an immediate threat to jobs in the United States.
Many now predict that "net neutrality" -- a Washington power grab that seeks to dictate how private telecoms prioritize use of limited bandwidth -- is walking the Green Mile. As Congress scurried to finish its legislative business before returning to the campaign trail, the compromise net neutrality legislation died in committee, say Holtz-Eakin and Batkins.
- But its death gives the Federal Communications Commission another chance to regulate the bandwidth decisions of private companies.
- This could spell death to the thousands of jobs created each year by the billions of dollars private telecoms spend on infrastructure.
- Imposing net neutrality could reduce broadband expansion and cost the U.S. economy upwards of 300,000 jobs, according to a new Phoenix Center study.
- Just a 10 percent decline in IT infrastructure investment, Brett Swanson of Entropy Economics found, could eliminate 502,000 jobs and $62 billion in gross domestic product growth.
The next Congress should put net neutrality and other job-killers in their rightful place: the ashbin of discredited policy ideas.
Source: Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Sam Batkins, "Net Neutrality: Job-Killing Zombie," October 27, 2010.
Browse more articles on Economic Issues