Gone with the Wind
September 27, 2010
When President Barack Obama seized the Gulf Coast oil spill to push for a clean energy bill, he spoke of wind power, though wind has little immediate connection with oil: Wind produces electricity, not the kind of fuel that oil provides for cars. The problems with wind and solar power are simple: The math doesn't add up, says the Texas Public Policy Foundation.
- The president's push for government-funded wind and solar energy -- and away from sources like coal and oil -- isn't new.
- Obama's February budget proposal for 2011 included a 48 percent increase in government subsidies for wind power -- from $83 million this year to $123 million in 2011.
- On solar energy, the president asked for a 22 percent hike -- from $247 million to $302 million.
Experts point to already-proven energy sources they believe deserve more attention: natural gas and nuclear energy. Natural gas, in particular, is abundant and available now. It is also easier to extract than oil and cleaner than coal. And -- like nuclear power -- natural gas trumps any wide scale potential promised by wind or solar energy. To make wind and solar energy sources consistently reliable on a wide scale would require massive amounts of reliable storage -- technology that doesn't exist on a cost-effective basis. Forcing utility companies to generate more of their power using wind and solar would likely raise energy costs for U.S. consumers, says the Foundation.
- The Nature Conservancy, a U.S. environmental group, published a report last year estimating that wind power requires about 30 times as much land as nuclear energy, and four times as much land required for natural gas.
- The high costs, unreliability and land usage are not just a problem for prosperous nations like the United States -- the dynamic is especially unrealistic for developing countries in desperate need of cheap energy for basic survival.
- Connecting the developing world to affordable sources of energy -- including sources like coal and oil -- and moving the poorest populations away from using sources like wood and dung, remains a critical way to raise the standard of living in some of the most miserable places in the world.
Source: Jamie Dean, "Gone with the Wind," Texas Public Policy Foundation, September 2010.
Browse more articles on Environment Issues