READ THE UNION HEALTH CARE LABEL
September 11, 2009
In the heated debates on health care reform, not enough attention is being paid to the huge financial windfalls ObamaCare will dole out to unions -- or to the provisions in the various bills in Congress that will help bring about the forced unionization of the health care industry.
Tucked away in thousands of pages of complex new rules, regulations and mandates are special privileges and giveaways that could have devastating consequences for the health care sector and the American economy at large.
The Senate version opens the door to implement forced unionization schemes pursued by former Govs. Rod Blagojevich of Illinois in 2005 and Gray Davis of California in 1999:
- Both men repaid tremendous political debts to Andy Stern and his Service Employees International Union (SEIU) by reclassifying state-reimbursed in-home health care (and child-care) contractors as state employees -- and forcing them to pay union dues.
- Following this playbook, the Senate bill creates a "personal care attendants workforce advisory panel" that will likely impose union affiliation to qualify for a newly created "community living assistance services and support (class)" reimbursement plan.
The current House version of ObamaCare (H.R. 3200) goes much further:
- Section 225(A) grants Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius tremendous discretionary authority to regulate health care workers "under the public health insurance option."
- Monopoly bargaining and compulsory union dues may quickly become a required standard resulting in potentially hundreds of thousands of doctors and nurses across the country being forced into unions.
Sebelius will be taking her marching orders from the numerous union officials who are guaranteed seats on the various federal panels (such as the personal care panel mentioned above) charged with recommending health care policies. Big Labor will play a central role in directing federal health care policy affecting hundreds of thousands of doctors, surgeons and nurses, explains Mix:
- The House bill has a $10 billion provision to bail out insolvent union health care plans.
- It also creates a lucrative professional-development grant program for health care workers that effectively blackballs nonunion medical facilities from participation.
- The training funds in this program must be administered jointly with a labor organization -- a scenario not unlike the U.S. Department of Labor's grants for construction apprenticeship programs, which have turned into a cash cow for construction industry union officials on the order of hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
- Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus has suggested that the federal government could pay for health care reform by taxing American workers' existing health care benefits -- but he would exempt union-negotiated health care plans.
- Under Baucus's scheme, the government could impose costs of up to $20,000 per employee on nonunion businesses already struggling to afford health care plans.
- Baucus's proposal would give union officials another tool to pressure employers into turning over their employees to Big Labor.
- Rather than provide the lavish benefits required by ObamaCare, employers could allow a union to come in and negotiate less costly benefits than would otherwise be required; such plans could be continuously exempted.
Source: Mark Mix, "Read the Union Health Care Label; Get ready for Detroit-style labor relations in our hospitals," Wall Street Journal, September 10, 2009.
Browse more articles on Health Issues