NCPA - National Center for Policy Analysis

ZAPPED

August 5, 2008

Are stun guns that immobilize but do not kill really non-lethal?  Canadians have been wondering since a Polish immigrant died last October at Vancouver airport after police subdued him with a Taser, the most popular brand of the electronic weapon.  An amateur video of the incident posted on YouTube sparked a public debate, and several official inquiries. 

On July 22nd a 17-year old youth in Winnipeg became the 21st person to die in Canada after being fired at with a Taser:

  • The gun's American manufacturer, Taser International, has sold 300,000 of them to police forces in 45 countries.
  • It contends that just because someone dies after receiving a jolt, it does not necessarily follow that the Taser was to blame.
  • It says -- and some doctors agree -- that pre-existing heart conditions, drug and alcohol abuse, and the agitation of having been pursued are all more likely causes of deaths in police custody.
  • Tom Smith, Taser's chairman, told a committee of Canada's Parliament earlier this year that although 50,000 volts sounds like a lot, a static charge from a doorknob is almost as high.

Such arguments have proved persuasive with juries:

  • Taser International has won or had dismissed 71 lawsuits for wrongful death or injury.
  • Most of these cases were in the United States, where just over 300 deaths following Taser use have been recorded.
  • The company suffered a rare courtroom loss earlier this year when a Californian jury ordered it to pay $6.2m to the parents of a man who died after being shocked (it is appealing).
  • A company spokesman points out that no medical examiner in Canada has pointed to the Taser as a contributing factor in any deaths.

Source: "Zapped: Do electronic stun guns take more lives than they save?" Economist, July 31, 2008.

For text:

http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11848478

 

Browse more articles on Government Issues