Benefits of Advertising Ignored by Opponents
September 16, 1998
Similarly, Republicans have long known that without advertising many wouldn't get elected because of liberal media bias. But once when they run advertisements, their electoral chances improve markedly.
Thus, if liberals can restrict advertising, people will be more dependent on them for information -- greatly enhancing their ability to implement a liberal agenda, Bartlett says. Although the First Amendment constrains the government's ability to restrict advertising, many restrictions have been implemented. For example, tobacco companies are legally prohibited from advertising their products on television.
In "Fear of Persuasion," American Enterprise Institute economist John Calfee points out that advertising has had enormous benefits for consumers. It has lowered prices for many goods, such as eyeglasses and prescription drugs, and improved the welfare of consumers by providing them with information about new products and new uses for existing products. Indeed, the Federal Trade Commission, no friend of business, consistently defends advertising as essential to help consumers make informed choices.
Calfee also points out that problems in advertising tend to be self-correcting. That is because competitors -- whether in business or politics -- will quickly point out any misstatements, overstatements or inflated claims in their own ads. This market constraint on false advertising is generally far more effective than government regulation.
Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, September 16, 1998.
Browse more articles on Economic Issues