March 10, 2008
A new report finds that banning payday lending -- small, short-term, high-interest loans available from companies like Cash Advance and Check'n Go -- makes customers worse off. The study, released in November by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, looked at Georgia and North Carolina, where payday lending has been banned.
According to authors Donald P. Morgan of the Federal Reserve and Michael R. Strain of Cornell University:
- The citizens of those states bounced more checks, complained more about lenders and debt collectors, and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy more often.
- The correlation between reduced payday lending and increased credit problems is consistent with the hypothesis that payday credit is preferable to substitutes such as the bounced-check "protection" sold by credit unions and banks or loans from pawnshops.
Industry critics charge that the $15 fee that payday lenders charge for a two-week $100 loan is exorbitant, amounting to 391 percent annually if the loan is rolled over for a year, accruing $15 every two weeks. The Community Financial Services Association of America, an industry group, did the math on the rates incurred with other options:
- A $100 bounced check garners a $54 fee, which comes out to an annual percentage rate of 1,409.
- A $37 late fee on a $100 credit card balance amounts to an annual percentage rate of 965 percent.
The authors confirm this pattern: Forcing households to replace costly credit with even costlier credit is bound to make them worse off.
Source: Katherine Mangu-Ward, "Bad Bounce," Reason, March 1, 2008.
Browse more articles on Economic Issues