THE RIGHT ENERGY SOLUTION
February 7, 2008
If gas prices stay at current levels, then in 2008 Americans will pay about 1 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), or $130 billion more for oil than they paid in 2007, and $180 billion more than they paid in 2006. These are significant increases, about the size of the economic stimulus package being debated in Congress. Put it another way: if we could get oil prices down to 2006 or 2007 levels, we wouldn't need a stimulus package, says Diana Furchtgott-Roth, former chief economist at the U.S. Department of Labor, and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute.
What are our politicians doing about this? Not enough, says Furchtgott-Roth:
- President Bush's 2009 budget, released on Monday, recommends spending $687 million on electricity from nuclear power; the funds would primarily be used to help the regulatory approval process and develop technologies to reduce and dispose of waste.
- Nuclear power could generate clean electricity that could substitute for coal, if regulatory and liability problems could be worked out, but until plug-in cars become widely available, atomic fission cannot be harnessed to propel vehicles, which account for about 24 percent of American energy consumption.
- So far companies have not been willing to go through red tape, public anxiety, and risks of lawsuits to build nuclear plants; no new power plant has been ordered since 1978, and the last one finished was in 1996.
The president's other energy proposals are either counterproductive, or mere window-dressing, says Furchtgott-Roth:
- He proposes to double the Strategic Petroleum Reserve — buy more oil at high prices and take it off the market, which would raise prices, not lower them.
- He wants $648 million for clean coal technologies and $400 million for research into clean technologies for developing countries to help alleviate global warming.
Source: Diana Furchtgott-Roth, "The Right Energy Solution," New York Sun, February 6, 2008.
Browse more articles on Environment Issues