NCPA - National Center for Policy Analysis

JOBS-PLUS WORKS

March 25, 2005

Public-housing residents are more likely to seek higher-paying jobs if they believe they will not be penalized with higher rents that lower their income, say researchers from the Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC), a New York nonprofit organization specializing in social-policy research. They also found that not increasing rents, combined with other incentives, prompts residents to move up the income scale.

In a six-year review of a pilot project known as Jobs-Plus, researchers tracked 5,000 residents of public-housing complexes and compared the earnings at complexes with Jobs-Plus to sites with similar population and salary demographics. Some results:

  • Annual earnings of residents at three public-housing complexes that fully implemented Jobs-Plus were 14 percent higher annually over the first three years of the project than they would have been without the program.
  • Rental incentives that allowed residents to keep more of their earnings, as well as employment-related services such as resume writing, combined to increase the incomes of residents participating in the project by nearly 20 percent during the last year of the project.
  • Implementing the program at a complex is estimated to cost about $150 per targeted resident a month.

According to the researchers, earnings are especially noteworthy both because they persisted even after the onset of a national economic recession and because they represent value added by the program over and above any effects produced by concurrent reforms in the welfare, work-force and public-housing systems.

Source: Gary Fields, "Housing Study Finds Path to Higher Paying Jobs," Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2005; based upon: Howard S. Bloom, James A. Riccio and Nandita Verma, "Promoting Work in Public Housing: The Effectiveness of Jobs-Plus," Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC), March 2005.

For text:

http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111145270657085745-search,00.html

 

Browse more articles on Tax and Spending Issues