![]() | |
![]() |
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS HOME / DONATE / ONE LEVEL UP / ABOUT NCPA / CONTACT New Environmentalism |
![]() | |
Notes |
1 Gregg Easterbrook, A Moment on Earth (New York: Viking, 1995).
See also William Rosenberg, "Our Air Is Getting Cleaner," presentation
at Inside Washington Publishers Conference, The Clean Air Act: Market-Based
Approaches to the New Statute, Arlington, VA, October 27, 1992. Back...
2 Marla Cone, "Southland Smog Levels Are Lowest in Four Decades,"
Los Angeles Times, Part A, October 21, 1995, p. 1. Back...
3 Easterbrook, A Moment on Earth. Back...
4 "How Clean Is Clean?" First Phase Report (Washington, DC: National
Environmental Policy Institute, 1995). Back...
5 Dale W. Jorgenson and Peter J. Wilcoxen, "Intertemporal General Equilibrium
Modeling of U.S. Environmental Regulation," Journal of Policy Modeling
12, Winter 1990, p. 717. Back...
6 John D. Graham, "Comparing Opportunities to Reduce Health Risks:
Toxin Control, Medicine and Injury Prevention," National Center for
Policy Analysis, NCPA Policy Report No. 192, June 1995. Back...
7 See Kent Jeffreys, "Progressive Environmentalism: Principles for
Regulatory Reform," National Center for Policy Analysis, NCPA Policy
Report No. 194, June 1995, pp. 2-4. Back...
8 Richard Stroup and John Baden, Natural Resources: Bureaucratic Myths
and Environmental Management (San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute,
1983); Terry Anderson and Donald Leal, Free Market Environmentalism
(San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute, 1991); Walter Block, ed., Economics
and the Environment: A Reconciliation (Vancouver, BC: Fraser Institute,
1990); Alston Chase, Playing God in Yellowstone (New York: Atlantic
Monthly Press, 1986); Bruce Yandle, ed., Land Rights: The 1990s Property
Rights Rebellion (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995); Yandle,
The Political Limits of Environmental Regulation (New York: Quorum
Books, 1989); and Joseph L. Bast, Peter J. Hill and Richard C. Rue, Eco-Society,
A Common Sense Guide to Environmentalism (Lanham, MD: Madison Books,
1994). Back...
9 As author Gregg Easterbrook has cautioned, "There exists a wide range
of human actions careless, selfish or destructive to the environment."
See Easterbrook, A Moment on Earth, p. xix. Back...
10 "Naturists" as used here refers to the nonscience-oriented,
emotive environmentalists. Back...
11 For example, in this model, ecosystems, absent human intervention, tend
toward balance and stability over time. Back...
12 In recent years, the mistrust is being replaced by such ideas as "growth
within limits" or sustainable development, but the emphasis is still
on limits rather than dynamic entrepreneurship. Back...
13 Gus diZerega writes that "new or organismic views of ecology do
not attempt to reduce the natural world to any single set of standards.
They instead focus on the incredible intricacy of environmental relationships...and
the extraordinary creativity of evolutionary processes." See diZerega,
"Unexpected Harmonies: Self-Organizing Liberal Modernity and Ecology,"
Trumpeter 10, Winter 1993, p. 28. Back...
14 This is true of the complex interactions of human activity with ecosystems,
the web of effects set in motion by each resource-use decision and the risks
and benefits associated with each production, consumption and disposal choice.
Back...
15 See Friedrich A. Hayek, "The Use of Knowledge in Society,"
American Economic Review 35, 4 September 1945, pp. 519-30. Back...
16 See Robert Worcester's discussion of Abraham Maslow's work as it relates
to environmentalism in "Business & the Environment: The Predictable
Shock of Brent Spar," presentation to The Prince of Wales's Business
& The Environment Programme, University of Cambridge Programme for Industry,
Cambridge, England, September 18, 1995. Back...
19 For example, in Kassel, Germany, city officials passed a tax on all disposable
packaging at fast food establishments. The tax forced many restaurants to
switch to reusable service ware. Restaurants were not able to balance any
potential health and safety trade-offs against the possible advantages of
waste reduction. Instead, the decision became a unidimensional one, with
waste reduction eclipsing all other concerns as a result of the high packaging
tax. Back...
20 See Jane S. Shaw and Richard L. Stroup, "Should We Worry About Ozone?"
National Center for Policy Analysis, NCPA Policy Report No. 191, June 1995,
pp. 14-16. Back...
21 In one sense, all values are noneconomic values. Economist Thomas Sowell
points out that "the most widespread misunderstanding of economics
is that it applies solely to financial transactions," which leads to
statements that some values are not economic ones. To this comment, Sowell
responds that, indeed, "there are only noneconomic values. Economics
is not a value itself but merely a method of trading off one value against
another." Thomas Sowell, Knowledge and Decisions (New York:
Basic Books, 1980). Back...
22 This concept has been developed by Bruce Lippke and others at the University
of Washington in Seattle. See Bruce Lippke, "Incentives for Managing
Landscapes to Meet Non-Timber Goals," presented at the Environmental
Economics Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 1994. Back...
23 Even in markets, individuals are never fully sovereign. Consider the
thermostat setting in a room. I may prefer a 60 degree setting; you may
prefer 70 degrees. We cannot simultaneously have both. Usually, the decision
about temperature setting is made by a building owner, a building manager
or a tenant. The rest of us must accept the resulting temperature. Back...
24 Sowell summarizes this point in Knowledge and Decisions: "...denunciations
of inefficiency and waste are often nothing more than statements of a different
set of preferences. Schemes to turn particular decisions or processes over
to 'experts' ...are often simply ways of allowing one group of people to
impose their subjective preferences on others." Back...
25 Environmental Quality, 15th Annual Report of the Council on Environmental
Quality (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985), pp. 387-94. Back...
26 See U.S. Office of Technology Assessment, Green Products by Design
(Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992); J. H. Ausubel and
H. E. Sladovich, eds., Technology and the Environment (Washington,
DC: National Academy Press, 1989); and Lynn Scarlett, "Packaging, Solid
Waste, and Environmental Trade-Offs" in Illahee: Journal of the
Northwest Environment 10, no. 1, 1994. Back...
27 Recently, soda can makers shaved another 1/1000th of an inch off the
top and bottom of soda cans - the equivalent of one-seventh of a human hair
fiber - to save even more on materials. Back...
28 Garrett Hardin, "Tragedy of the Commons," Science 162,
November 11, 1986, pp. 1243-48. See also Garrett Hardin and John Baden,
Managing the Commons (New York: W. H. Freeman & Co., 1977). Back...
29 Property rights, properly enforced, establish conditions both of rights
and responsibilities. In a sense, they create conditions of stewardship,
since they directly link individuals to the outcomes of their actions. They
also create boundaries for human action by restricting the spheres within
which one can act autonomously. Beyond those spheres, autonomous actions
are limited at a minimum by a "do no harm" principle. Within those
spheres, individuals can pursue self-defined values, including both utilitarian
values such as using the land to farm and spiritual values such as protecting
natural habitats. Back...
30 See John C. Goodman and Richard L. Stroup, "Progressive Environmentalism:
A Pro-Human, Pro-Science, Pro-Free Enterprise Agenda for Change," National
Center for Policy Analysis, NCPA Policy Report No. 162, April 1991. Back...
31 See, for example, Randal O'Toole, Reforming the Forest Service
(Washington, DC: Island Press, 1988); Marc Reisner, Cadillac Desert:
The American West and Its Disappearing Water (New York: Viking, 1986);
Karl Hess Jr., Visions upon the Land: Man and Nature on the Western Range
(Washington, DC: Island Press, 1992); Richard L. Stroup and John Baden,
Natural Resources: Bureaucratic Myths and Environmental Management
(Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1983). Back...
32 See Rodney Fort and John Baden, "The Federal Budget as a Common
Pool Resource," in John Baden and Richard L. Stroup, Bureaucracy
vs. Government: The Environmental Cost of Bureaucratic Government (Ann
Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1981). Back...
33 National Research Council, Committee on Diet and Health, Diet and
Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk (Washington,
DC: National Academy Press, 1989), p. 695. In general, the risk to human
health from either natural or man-made pesticides in our food supplies is
negligible. The National Academy of Sciences implicitly recognized this
fact when it recommended establishing "a negligible risk standard in
setting and revising tolerances for all [carcinogenic] pesticides found
in food." See National Research Council, Regulating Pesticides in
Food: The Delaney Paradox (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1987),
p. 12. According to Dr. Sanford Miller, Dean of the Graduate School of Biomedical
Sciences at the University of Texas, "Today's pesticides represent
trivial risks to the public and to our food safety. The pesticide residue
risk is so low as to be meaningless, whatever the specific numbers of the
risk estimates." Cited in Dennis T. Avery, Global Food Progress
(Indianapolis: Hudson Institute, 1991), p. 134. Back...
34 For an assessment of the limits of cost-benefit analysis, see Robert
Formaini, The Myth of Scientific Public Policy (Social Philosophy
and Policy Center: Bowling Green, OH, and Transaction Books: New Brunswick,
NJ, 1990). Back...
35 This exercise does not necessarily require complex mathematical calculations.
Often, the cost-benefit balance is very clear up to a point at which costs
of further mitigation escalate dramatically. At this point, more careful
quantitative analysis of costs and benefits may be necessary. Back...
36 See, for example, Aaron Wildavsky, Searching for Safety (New Brunswick,
NJ: Transaction Books, 1998). Back...
37 Daniel K. Mitchell, "The Deadly Impact of Federal Regulations,"
Journal of Regulation and Social Costs, June 1992. Back...
38 Economist Israel Kirzner has written that "entrepreneurship in individual
action consists in endeavors to secure a greater correspondence between
an individual's future as he envisages it, and his future as it will in
fact unfold." Kirzner's comment suggests that we are better off if
we have many competing "anticipators." Israel Kirzner, "Uncertainty,
Discovery and Human Action: A Study of the Entrepreneurial Profile in the
Misesian System," in Israel Kirzner, ed., Method, Process and Austrian
Economics: Essays in Honor of Ludwig von Mises (Lexington, MA: Lexington
Books, 1982), p. 151. Back...
39 Cesar V. Conda and Mark D. LaRochelle, "The New Populism: The Rise
of the Property Rights Movement," Commonsense 1, Fall 1994,
pp. 78-98. Back...
40 See, for instance, Ryan C. Amacher, Robert D. Tollison and Thomas D.
Willett, "The Economics of Fatal Mistakes: Fiscal Mechanisms for Preserving
Endangered Predators," in Terry L. Anderson and Peter J. Hill, Wildlife
in the Marketplace (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995), pp.
43-60. Back...
41 Ross Korves, deputy chief economist of the American Farm Bureau, puts
it this way: "The argument is made that takings legislation would require
the government to pay compensation to [a polluter] if a unit of government
forced him to stop dumping waste into [a stream]. The takings issue is not
relevant in this situation. Under common law and nuisance law ... no property
owner has an unlimited right to harm the land of others or to create a public
nuisance. The responsibility to not degrade others' property is a basic
feature of the right to own and use property." Ross Korves, memorandum
to American Farm Bureau members, 1995. Back...
42 This has occurred in some communities that have agreed to see landfills
sited locally in exchange for financial compensation and other benefits
from the landfill operator. Back...
43 See, for example, E. M. Fijita and Douglas Lawson, "Evaluation of
the Emissions Inventory in the South Coast Air Basin," Desert Research
Institute, Reno, NV, August 8, 1994. This knowledge should steer us toward
policies that focus on cleaning up the few gross polluters or getting them
off the road. By contrast, going after the many clean cars will likely cost
a lot of money and yield minimal air quality improvements. Back...
44 Roger E. Meiners describes the long history of effective use of tort
law as a means of protecting individuals against harms caused by pollution
in "Elements of Property Rights: The Common Law Alternative" in
Yandle, ed., Land Rights, pp. 269-93. Back...
45 Consider a few examples. First is the case of lead poisoning in the Roman
Empire. One of the earliest recorded epidemiology reports was of heavy metal
poisoning that resulted from use of lead in Roman aqueducts. Second is the
case of the "mad hatter," a term that came from the effects of
using mercury in the making of felt hats. Third and more recent is the case
of cadmium bioamplification in rice and soybeans in Japan; the cadmium was
discharged in the effluent from mining operations and eventually worked
its way into the food supply. In such cases, uniform strict standards or
bans on the handling, use or disposal of these materials might make sense.
However, when these kinds of acute problems appear, the marketplace often
moves quickly to eliminate them. For example, after it became clear that
vapors from chromium-plating processes resulted in serious health problems
for workers, industries found ways of safely containing the vapors. The
same evolution occurred among dentists in their use of mercury amalgams.
Dentists found ways of minimizing exposures to the mercury vapors created
during preparation of the amalgams, and some dentists turned to substitutes.
Trade associations, trade unions and professional organizations often promote
change by providing safety information to members. Back...
46 Anderson and Leal, Free Market Environmentalism. Back...
47 Sowell wrote that "there is no reason to believe that people will
generally make a better set of choices out of a smaller set of options,
where the larger set includes all the options in the smaller set."
See Sowell, Knowledge and Decisions, p. 128. Back...
48 Robert W. Crandall, "Ackerman and Hassler's Clean Coal/Dirty
Air," Bell Journal of Economics 12, Autumn 1981. Back...
49 See Michael Crew and Paul Kleindorfer, The Economics of Public Utility
Regulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986); see also Julian Simon,
The Ultimate Resource (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1981). Back...
50 See Robert Repetto, Skimming the Water (Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute, 1986). Back...
51 Meiners, in Yandle, Land Rights, p. 27. Back...
52 For an excellent discussion of the use of the common law for protecting
the environment, see Elizabeth Brubaker, Property Rights in Defense of
Nature (London: Earthscan Publications, 1995). Back...
53 Audit protection laws may, however, be required to ensure that problems
uncovered through audits, and which are not the consequence of negligence
or intent to violate a law, are not cause for fines and other penalties.
A number of states now have such audit protection laws. Back...
54 Mike Vivoli, "Putting People Last," CEI Update, November
1992, pp. 1, 3. Back...
55 Environmental Quality, 15th Annual Report of the Council on Environmental
Quality (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985). Back...
56 Lippke, "Incentives for Managing Landscapes to Meet Non-Timber Goals."
Back...
57 See, for example, James M. Holway and Raymond J. Burby, "The Effects
of Flood Plain Development Controls on Residential Land Values," Land
Economics, August 1990; and Holway and Burby, "Reducing Flood Losses:
Local Planning and Land-use Controls," Journal of the American Planning
Association, March 22, 1993. Back...
58 As Scott Bush of the National Environmental Policy Institute notes, this
would "allow facilities to use an appropriate mix of emission, effluent,
and source reduction (pollution prevention) technologies and techniques
to meet the environmental goals." See draft "Consensus Objectives,"
Unified/Organic Statute Sector, Reinventing EPA & Environmental Policy
Working Group, National Environmental Policy Institute, Washington, DC.
Back... |