Next Steps: What Can Congress Do?
|
The principles and decision filters of new environmentalism are tools with
which to evaluate different policy options. They also provide a map to direct
environmental policy reformers on their long, evolutionary road. Examples
of specific public policies that reformers can encourage Congress and the
administration to implement follow.
Unified Statute and Devolution. Passage of a Unified Environmental
Reform Statute is a good first step. A unified statute would create procedures
for decentralizing decision making and measuring successes. It could target
the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act for revision through phased-in devolution and the sunsetting
of duplicative provisions. Because we know that many of the risks addressed
by current legislation are trivial or nonexistent, the best decisions about
these risks would be made locally. [Knowledge Filter; Risk Filter] Furthermore,
different localities would discover and implement different solutions based
on their unique conditions. [Strategy Filter]
Several ideas that have been outlined by the Washington, D.C.-based National
Environmental Policy Institute serve as a useful starting point for such
a statute. A unified statute should:
- Devolve to the states authority, responsibility and accountability
for setting environmental goals where impacts are primarily local, implementing
policy and monitoring success. [Decentralization principle] Where air basins
or watersheds cross state boundaries, the states involved would have primary
authority for setting acceptable standards, and the national role would
be one of mediator. [Flexibility principle]
- Create sunset provisions to phase out existing legislation as revised
environmental laws are introduced. As states and localities demonstrate
increased competence and ability, they should gain responsibility for their
environmental problems. They should not have their hands tied by cumbersome
and outdated environmental statutes that dictate priorities, standards and
technologies. Since new environmental problems arise and existing but previously
unrecognized problems emerge over time, old programs should be eliminated
so as not to hamper new solutions. [Efficiency principle, Do No Harm principle]
- Create a performance-based system that emphasizes ambient environmental
standards, not the use of specific technologies. [Balancing principle, Flexibility
principle, Efficiency principle]
- Establish mechanisms for developing ambient standards and issuing
permits so that emission permits could be freely traded.58 Permits could
take the form of contracts or covenants. [Flexibility principle, Individualism
principle]
|
| "Emphasis can be shifted away from punishment toward problem solving." |
Civic Environmentalism Act. The second step to environmental reform
by the Congress would be a Civic Environmentalism Act shifting emphasis
away from punishment and toward problem solving, bargaining, technical innovation
and information exchange. Such an act would begin the privatization of decisions
regarding environmental problems. It also would encourage bargaining approaches
for Superfund site cleanups, brownfields redevelopment, federal facilities
cleanups, toxic emission standard setting and other problems with primarily
local impacts. Many states have passed legislation to promote voluntary
environmental audits by private firms. Firms need assurances that these
voluntary audits will not result in penalties, fines and prosecutions for
environmental problems uncovered - and corrected. A Civic Environmentalism
Act should include similar audit protections at the federal level. The act
would:
|
|
- Reform environmental enforcement by clarifying which actions are subject
to criminal penalties and which to civil and administrative proceedings,
bring sentencing guidelines for environmental crimes into conformance with
those for comparable crimes and eliminate multiple prosecutions for a single
violation. [Efficiency principle]
- Develop and allow states to develop "environmental audit privilege"
laws, providing immunity from prosecution to companies that seek out, disclose
and correct violations of environmental laws. Current laws allow such information
to be used against the company and its officials in criminal and civil trials.
Audit privilege laws would end the perverse incentive to cover up environmentally
harmful actions, increasing the flow and accuracy of information available
to decision makers. [Information flow filter]
- Create an environmental extension program to help farmers and business
owners reduce environmental impacts. Such programs could be funded privately
or by shifting funds away from punitive approaches or using proceeds from
pollution charges. [Decentralization principle, Flexibility principle]
- Facilitate the establishment of local market-like bargaining and negotiating
processes. Some states and projects already have such processes. For example,
some local communities convene informal task forces to weigh cleanup alternatives
for brownfields. [Flexibility principle, Efficiency Principle]
Environmental Amenities Act. The third step would be an Environmental
Amenities Act patterned in part after 1995 House proposals for takings compensation.
The act would compensate property owners who lose some or all use of their
property to public environmental amenities such as wilderness, wildlife
and wetlands protection. The act would create incentives for environmental
stewardship and relieve individuals and firms from providing public amenities
at private expense. [Ownership filter] An Environmental Amenities Act would:
- Require takings compensation for private landowners who must provide
public amenities. Such provisions would not include compensation for costs
associated with regulations to mitigate pollution. [Balancing principle,
Efficiency principle, Compensation principle]
- Require that private property be included in public environmental
programs (e.g., habitat management plans, ecosystem management plans, national
and international heritage sites and biosphere reserves) only with the permission
of the owner(s) or upon the payment of takings compensation. [Individualism
principle, Compensation principle]
- Empower states to encourage wildlife and habitat protection by using
bounties and other tools that allow private parties to benefit from producing
environmental goods. [Individualism principle, Flexibility principle]
|