![]() | |
![]() |
NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS HOME / DONATE / ONE LEVEL UP / ABOUT NCPA / CONTACT Compulsory Savings in Singapore: An Alternative to the Welfare State |
![]() | |
Mukul G. AsherAssociate Professor of Economicsand Public Policy National University of Singapore
NCPA Policy Report No. 198
Executive Summary
IntroductionThe issue of financing retirement pensions and health care expenses for the elderly has received considerable attention in recent years. In the future, it will receive even more. In 1990, almost half a billion people, slightly more than 9 percent of the world's population, were over 60 years old. By the year 2030, the number will triple to 1.4 billion, and more than half of them will live in Asia.1 Singapore is expected to experience a surge in the number of elderly and in the proportion of the population who areelderly:2
"Singapore finances its social security system through a publicly managed, mandatory program of private saving." How the Central Provident Fund WorksSingapore's provident fund system, established by the colonial government in 1955, has become the primary vehicle for saving for most Singaporeans. Since its inception, the CPF has expanded to incorporate a wide range of programs and options, including home ownership, investments, health care, insurance and college loans. [See Table I.] With about 2.4 million participants, CPF held member accounts totaling $57 billion,6 or 72 percent of GDP, at the end of 1994. [See Table II.] Because of its size and the inclination of the government to use it for a variety of purposes, the CPF plays a very important role in the economic and social life of Singapore. Its design, structure and management are of crucial importance, since the well-being of most Singaporeans is tied to its performance.General features of the fund.Most citizens of Singapore are required to be members of the Central Provident Fund. The accounts belong to individuals; deposits are made by both employee and employer and, currently, deposits are 40 percent of wages up to S$6,000 per month (the average annual wage, including the employer's contribution, is S$30,038). All savings, both at time of deposit and time of withdrawal, are tax exempt.7"CPF accounts belong to the individual, affording options not available under pay-as-you-go social security systems." Members of the CPF get annual account statements. A telephone hotline allows members to check on their accounts' status at any time. Members also can write to the fund at any time for information. Because a CPF account belongs to the individual, it affords its holder a number of options that are not available under pay-as-you-go social security systems. Unlike many private pensions in the United States, the accounts are portable, remaining with the employee through job transitions; the entire deposit belongs to the member's estate at death; and account funds may, to a limited degree, be shared with members of the account holder's immediate family. Participation is compulsory for most people. As Table II shows, about two-thirds of the total labor force actively participates in the CPF. This represents a decline from about three-fourths of the labor force in the early 1980s. Although details about the one-third not covered are unavailable, foreign workers, who constitute about 18 percent of the labor force, generally are not covered.8 Also not covered are casual and part-time workers and certain categories of contract workers. The self-employed are covered by the Medisave program (to be discussed later) and can make tax-advantaged, voluntary contributions to the other programs. Pension benefits are provided for certain categories of government personnel (e.g., the president, political office holders, Members of Parliament, certain civilian and military public officers). Beginning April 1, 1995, instead of pension payments being met from current revenue, a separate pension fund has been established.9 While most Singapore citizens and permanent residents not covered by the CPF (e.g., most of the self-employed and those with government pensions) will be able to cope financially with retirement, a significant minority of workers will face financial difficulty because their ability to save for retirement has been extremely limited.10 "Singapore has the highest savings rate in the world." The rates of mandatory contributions are high. Singapore has the highest savings rate in the world, and one reason is that the rate of mandatory savings through the CPF is high.
Deposits and withdrawals are tax free.Contributions by both employers and employees are excluded from taxable income, as is any buildup in the account.15 Withdrawals at age 55 and beyond are also tax free. Balanced against these tax advantages is the fact that the interest rate paid on CPF balances is much lower than the return paid in the private capital market."Contributions by both employers and employees are excluded from taxable income, as is any buildup." As discussed below, members can invest some of their funds in private securities, and the return on funds contributed and quickly withdrawn for other investments is much higher than on the long-term accumulations in the CPF. However, because members must have a minimum balance before withdrawing funds for other investments, higher-income groups are better able to withdraw and invest quickly. There is nothing inherently regressive about a provident fund (forced savings) system.16 Governments may choose to subsidize investments in any number of ways, and they can also manipulate other taxes in order to create more progressivity. Components of the SystemMembers maintain three accounts with the Central Provident Fund Board - Ordinary, Medisave and Special accounts. Among these three, the total contribution of 40 percent of income is credited as follows:
"Accounts are used to fund retirement pensions, medical care, housing, life and disability insurance and expenses for a college education." Retirement income.When a CPF member reaches age 55, he is permitted to withdraw from his account all money above a minimum sum of S$40,000, which the government requires be left in the account. Two-thirds of CPF members reaching age 55 have accounts exceeding the minimum sum, and most withdraw all but the minimum sum and apply that money to other, more lucrative investments.At least S$4,000 of the S$40,000 minimum sum must be in cash, and the remaining amount may be a member's pledged property.19 However, if a member sells this property, he must ensure that the CPF board gets the required minimum amount in cash. A member may dispose of the minimum sum in one of three ways:
Medisave accounts.Beginning in 1984, the government of Singapore extended its program of forced savings to require that a certain portion of CPF contributions be put into a Medisave account to fund hospitalization both during a person's working life and during retirement. Currently, 6 to 8 percent of an employee's salary is placed in a Medisave account, with a monthly maximum contribution of S$360, until the balance reaches S$17,000.20 Once that total is reached and maintained, additional contributions are automatically placed in an individual's Ordinary account. At age 55, a minimum balance of S$11,000 must be left in the account to pay medical bills during retirement. Any excess may be withdrawn. Contributions above that figure are automatically transferred to the Ordinary account.While the government generally has limited the use of Medisave funds to hospital care, it has been expanding its list of approved expenditures. For example, it now permits members to use Medisave funds for psychiatric care, renal dialysis and chemotherapy. However, members are still prohibited from using Medisave funds for outpatient care, physicians' fees, outpatient renal dialysis or long-term care. If money runs short, family members can pool their Medisave balances to pay a hospital bill, and some government hospitals allow patients to settle their bills from future Medisave deposits. The Singapore health care system relies in large part on individual self-insurance rather than third-party insurance, and its hospital system accommodates people with different spending preferences. Thirteen of the country's 23 hospitals are run by the Ministry of Health. The other hospitals are private. Hospitals run by the government offer four levels of rooms, or "wards," which receive different levels of government subsidies. Class A wards are the nicest rooms, with private or semiprivate accommodations, and are meant to compete with the private sector. Patients must pay 100 percent of the cost of these rooms. Class B1 wards receive a 20 percent government subsidy, with the patient paying the balance, and accommodate four people to a room. Class B2 wards have six patients per room and no air-conditioning, but patients pay only 35 percent of the cost. Class C wards have 10 to 20 people in the room and are the least expensive, receiving an 80 percent subsidy from the government. "The Singapore health care system relies in large part on individual self-insurance rather than third-party insurance." Over the years, as Medisave accounts have grown, so has the desire for the higher-class accommodations. According to one study, patients opting for Class A accommodations grew from 2 percent in 1982 to 8 percent in 1992, while the number choosing a private hospital, where patients receive better accommodations, grew from 16 percent to 24 percent during the same period.21 The Medishield option.22While most Singapore citizens can use their Medisave funds to cover smaller health care expenditures, most accounts are not large enough to cover a catastrophic illness. For example, in 1993, only two-fifths of those reaching age 55 had the required minimum Medisave balance (S$11,000). In response, the government created the Medishield program in 1990 to provide catastrophic insurance that complements the Medisave program.23 Medishield is neither need-based nor income-based. Eighty-eight percent of those eligible have opted for it. Annual premiums vary with age, and it is available to members up to age 70. It has a yearly claims limit of S$20,000 (1993) and a lifetime limit of S$70,000. It does not provide coverage for preexisting conditions. In 1990, Medishield covered 7.6 percent of the bill for Class A wards, 16.5 percent for Class B wards, and 21.7 percent of Class C wards for a hypothetical case of a 19-day hospital stay.24The government has established an endowment fund (Medifund) and uses the income to assist those with limited financial resources who need medical care and meet stringent means tests.25 Home ownership.To encourage home ownership, the Approved Housing Scheme (AHS) was set up in 1968. It allows members to use their CPF savings to buy housing units26 built by public sector statutory boards, of which the Housing and Development Board (HDB) is the most important. Members are allowed to withdraw CPF savings for the down payment (usually 20 percent) and monthly mortgage payments for housing loans offered by the HDB. Since 1986, the maximum repayment period has been 25 years and the mortgage interest has been pegged at 0.1 percentage points above the interest rate paid on CPF balances. When CPF savings are used to purchase housing, members must repay their CPF accounts the amount they withdraw - with interest - if they sell the property before reaching age 55.27 This program has been enormously successful. About 85 percent of the people in Singapore own their own homes, the highest rate of home ownership in the world."About 85 percent of the people in Singapore own their own homes." The government is now upgrading these housing units, with the homeowners bearing 25 percent of the cost and the government 75 percent. In addition, in 1981 the government began to allow members to use their CPF balances to purchase private residential properties, and in 1986 to purchase nonresidential properties as well. The rules governing these purchases have been progressively liberalized. Interestingly, CPF balances have not been used to provide loans to government or to statutory bodies to build housing or any other infrastructure. The government consistently has financed all current and capital expenditure from operating revenue, and so has not needed to tap into CPF balances. Investment options.The Approved Investment Scheme (AIS) was introduced in 1986. It allows members to invest a portion of their balances (initially 40 percent, subsequently raised to 80 percent, but only above a certain minimum balance set by the CPF board) in stocks approved by the CPF board and traded on the Singapore Stock Exchange, in approved unit trusts (mutual funds), in convertible loan stocks and in gold.28 On October 1, 1993, the government converted the AIS into the Basic Investment Scheme (BIS) and the Enhanced Investment Scheme (EIS). Under the BIS, members may use up to 80 percent of their CPF balance (this percentage includes savings already withdrawn for housing, education and other investments) in excess of S$35,400,29 or the balance in the Ordinary account, whichever is lower. Permitted investment instruments are about the same as they were for the AIS scheme.Under the EIS, a member may use 80 percent of the CPF balance in excess of S$50,000 cash savings in the Ordinary and Special accounts, or the balance in the Ordinary account, whichever is lower. In addition to investments permitted under the BIS, a member may invest in non-trustee shares, loan stocks of approved non-trustee stock companies, approved unit trusts, bank deposits, endowment policies (similar to annuities), fund management accounts30 and government bonds.31 Since January 1, 1995, members have been allowed to buy foreign stocks and bonds. Initially, they could invest only in foreign securities listed locally or on the stock markets of Hong Kong, Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan. Now they may invest in regional markets through approved CPF managers. Approved CPF unit trusts will be permitted to invest in these markets beginning in 1997. Beginning in 1999, investments in the stock markets of the United States and other Western countries, purchased through approved fund managers or unit trusts, will be permitted. Investments in foreign assets are currently limited to 20 percent of the market value of a unit trust fund. The percent of foreign investment permitted will be raised to 40 percent in 1997 and 50 percent in 1999. These moves suggest that the government is prepared to allow individuals to diversify their investments from CPF balances and to position Singapore as a fund management center. By allowing individuals to make more investment decisions, the government also hopes to reduce the political risks of having government manage all of the CPF accumulated balances. Persistently low returns that undermine the real value of people's CPF savings could have adverse political consequences for the ruling party. "People can direct the investment of their CPF funds, above a minimum amount." As of December 1993, 308,261 members (12.6 percent of the total members) had directed the investment of more than $7 billion of their CPF savings.32 In 1994 only about one-fifth of the 339,922 people who invested their CPF funds in shares (and other permitted investments) made profits - totaling $236 million.33 Of those who lost money on their outside investments, three-fourths sustained very small losses. Another investment option is the Share-Ownership Top-Up Scheme (SOTUS). Under it, government provides grants to CPF members so they can purchase shares of enterprises the state is divesting. Shares bought through SOTUS apparently do not confer voting power on the individual shareholders. Thus, the government subsidizes the purchase of such shares without losing control over the divested enterprises. Insurance options.Three types of insurance programs are a part of the CPF system. First, the Home Protection Insurance Scheme (HPIS) provides required mortgage payment insurance34 for members purchasing public housing from CPF funds. Second, the Dependents' Protection Insurance Scheme (DPIS) provides optional term insurance against death or permanent incapacity before age 55. Although the DPIS is optional, about 80 percent of the eligible members have opted for it. The annual premium in 1993 ranged from S$30 to S$190, depending on age. The scheme pays a S$30,000 benefit, roughly the same as the average annual wage. The third insurance provider is Medishield, the catastrophic coverage discussed above."Members may borrow from their accounts to pay expenses for attending or sending a family member to college." College education expenses.Members may borrow from their Ordinary account to pay expenses for attending or sending a family member to college in Singapore. The amount has to be repaid, however.Top-Up.Under the CPF Top-Up Scheme announced in fiscal year 1995, the government provides a grant of $200 to each CPF member.Investment Performance of the CPF BoardA distinction needs to be made between members' funds left in the CPF and the insurance funds35 that are managed by institutional fund managers and invested in fixed interest-bearing deposits, negotiable certificates of deposit, equities and bonds. Although the insurance funds are of relatively minor importance, in 1993 the implicit rate of return36 on the Medishield fund was 6.7 percent - considerably higher than the 2.5 percent rate of return the CPF pays on members' funds.According to statutory requirements, CPF funds must be invested in government bonds and in advanced deposits with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), which eventually converts the monies into bonds. In 1993, S$44.6 billion (85.3 percent of the total balances) was invested in government bonds and S$7.7 billion (14.8 percent of the total) in advanced deposits with the MAS.37 Given that the government enjoys budget surpluses, and that amounts borrowed are not used to finance infrastructure, how and where are the CPF balances invested? They are invested by the government through the Singapore Government Investment Corporation and other channels, and most are believed to be invested abroad. However, no information is available on either the investment portfolio or the returns obtained. CPF members' interest is calculated as an average of the 12-month deposit and monthly savings rates of four major local banks, subject to a minimum rate of 2.5 percent. The rationale for payment of short-term interest rates on long-term funds is not clear. As Table II shows, the real rate of return (the interest rate minus the inflation rate) has been slightly positive or negative since 1986. This contrasts sharply with the return on Medishield funds noted above. To the extent returns on CPF balances invested by the government are higher than what is paid to the members, the difference is an implicit tax on members, although this may be offset by tax subsidies. The implicit tax is likely to be regressive, as those with low balances have a greater proportion of their (forced savings) assets with the CPF. Assessing the CPFSince Singapore's fertility rate is below the replacement rate, its population will eventually peak and then decline, as those of the U.S. and many other industrialized countries already have begun to do. Fortunately, Singapore never attempted to maintain a constant replacement rate that required an ever-increasing payroll tax. Rather, Singapore's CPF has provided a solid and sustainable base for financing a competitive and affordable social security system."Singapore's CPF has provided a solid and sustainable base for financing a competitive and affordable social security system." Advantages.Among the most important advantages of the plan are:
Qualifications.Despite the attractions of the overall system, there are some important qualifications.
Policy implications.The discussion suggests that use of a provident fund as the primary instrument of social security in an affluent, rapidly aging society requires certain economic conditions. It also suggests the requirement for a paternalistic government that effectively pursues its version of public interest and for an organic or corporatist view of the state. Singapore policymakers have shown considerable ingenuity in adapting the CPF system to serve not only social security but also other ends. They can be expected to innovate further and perhaps to significantly extend the Medishield scheme to address its present deficiencies."Singapore policy makers have shown considerable ingenuity in adapting the CPF system to meet needs met by government in other countries." One particularly useful move, given the low or negative return on CPF balances, would be to ensure at least a 3 percent real rate of return on CPF balances. This would help to address social adequacy and equity issues and to mitigate incentives for individuals to overinvest in stocks and property. Lessons for other countries.Singapore's experience shows the value of emphasizing saving and individual responsibility to finance one's old age.Thus, the first lesson Singapore teaches is that each nation's social security system needs to be consistent with its social-political environment and its need to compete economically. While a too-generous system can impinge upon international competitiveness, a too-parsimonious system can create anticompetitive social tensions. Second, each nation must keep its social security administrative and compliance costs as low as possible. In 1990, operating cost as a percentage of annual contributions was only 0.53 percent in Singapore as compared to 1.99 percent for Malaysia and 15.4 percent for Chile. Its city-state status and high contribution rates give Singapore an advantage in this regard. A contributory pension system, backed up by policies that place greater responsibility on the individual for financing old age, can create new opportunities for self-discipline in saving.40 This approach can help to increase investment in human capital and in physical assets such as housing. It also can increase the individual's share in financing such services as health care. "A contributory pension system can create new opportunities for self-discipline in saving." Countries that practice pay-as-you-go policies - including the United States - would do well to incorporate features of the CPF into their social security systems. NOTE: Nothing written here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the National Center for Policy Analysis or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |