Labor Unions and the Joint Employer Rule

Brief Analyses | Work & Wages

No. 829
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
by

Two significant rulings by the National Labor Relations Board in 2015 expanded the longstanding interpretation of “joint employment,” a designation given when two firms are involved in directing, controlling, training and supervising an employee. The NLRB is a politically appointed board that governs employer relations with labor unions, but its new interpretation of joint employment will have the greatest effect on small businesses.

The impetus for the rule is the desire to ease unionization of small businesses that are franchisees of corporations, such as restaurant and retail food chains.

In a 2015 case involving Browning Ferris Industries, the NRLB ruled that Browning Ferris was not only responsible for those it employed directly, but also for contractors and those “indirectly” employed by the firm. Thus, it would be liable for labor violations committed by contractors, even when it has only indirect or “potential” control over employment conditions. In another case, involving McDonald’s Corporation, the NLRB ruled that McDonald’s is a joint employer and therefore could be responsible for alleged labor and anti discrimination law violations at its franchises in 30 locations across five states.

Franchises Are Small Businesses. The dictionary definition of a franchise is a store that is given the right to sell a company’s goods or services in a particular area. McDonald’s has about 2,700 restaurants, 80 percent of which are privately-owned franchises. The franchisor, McDonald’s Corporation, creates the line of products sold, markets the store brand through advertising and sets service standards and policies for individual stores to follow. However, individual store owners manage operations, set employee pay rates, hours and schedules and determine other employment policies, such as hiring, firing and promotion. The real issue underlying the McDonald’s and Browning Ferris cases has nothing to do with righting alleged wrongs. The ultimate goal is a unionized fast-food workforce in order to boost dues-paying union membership.

Continue Reading


Read Article as PDF