
Welfare | |
Welfare Reform And Food Stamps For Immigrants |
Welfare reforms passed by Congress in 1996 included a provision to deny
food stamps to legal immigrants who have not yet become U.S. citizens. Since
then, 935,000 legal immigrants have been cut from the food stamp program.
The Clinton administration wants to restore legal immigrants to food
stamp rolls. But congressional Republicans argue that restoring benefits
to immigrants who are not citizens would be a major retreat on welfare reform.
Noncitizens should be supported by their U.S. sponsors, they say.
Source: Richard Wolf, "Food Stamp Loss Takes Its Toll," USA
Today, January 28, 1998.
|
U.S. Welfare Luring Elderly Immigrants |
Our generous welfare system is attracting increasing numbers of the elderly
from other countries who wish to retire on its benefits.
An analysis by Norman Matloff of the University of California at Davis
reveals:
Dramatic changes in the current welfare system and immigration policy
have been proposed to reduce the influx of elderly welfare recipients. Measures
suggested include restricting welfare eligibility to citizens and allowing
the elderly to enter only as permanent "guests" of their U.S.
sponsors.
Source: Robert Rector (Heritage Foundation), "A Retirement Home for
Immigrants," Wall Street Journal, February 20, 1996.
|
Noncitizens on SSI |
Noncitizens of the United States are one of the fastest growing groups
of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients, according to recent congressional
testimony from the Government Accounting Office. The SSI program provides
means-tested income support payments to eligible aged, blind or disabled
persons.
SSI is one of the fastest growing entitlement programs -- its costs grew
20 percent annually from 1991 through 1994. In 1994, over six million SSI
recipients received nearly $22 billion in federal benefits and more than
$3 billion in supplemental state benefits.
If they receive SSI, noncitizens are also generally eligible for Medicaid.
Medicaid costs for noncitizens receiving SSI are even greater than the cost
of the cash benefits.
The term noncitizens includes legal immigrants, refugees and asylum-seekers,
and undocumented aliens legalized by the 1986 immigration reform act --
but not illegal aliens.
About 46 percent of noncitizen recipients applied for SSI within four years
of entering the U.S., although some were admitted with financial sponsors
who agreed to provide support to them for three years.
Source: Jane L. Ross, "Supplemental Security Income: Noncitizens Have
Been a Major Source of Caseload Growth," GAS/T-HEHS-96-88, February
6, 1996, Government Accounting Office: Washington, DC.
|
Immigrant Benefits Focus of Welfare Reform Challenges |
Activists opposing welfare reform are challenging the new law through court
suits. Many will focus on cessation of benefits to legal noncitizen immigrants
totaling 40 percent of the $55 billion savings over six years.
The GOP-sponsored welfare reform bill signed in August:
From 1986 to 1993, the noncitizen caseload under SSI grew on average
15 percent a year with evidence of fraud involved, according to the General
Accounting Office.
Major challenges will emerge in California, which is home to a third
of the nation's immigrants. In April, the state intends to begin cutting
off food stamps from some 373,000 of 436,000 legal immigrants now getting
them. Prominent among the groups challenging welfare reform is the American
Civil Liberties Union.
However, the cuts are not as all-encompassing as some opposition rhetoric
makes them appear. Legal immigrants can retain their welfare benefits by
becoming citizens -- as many are already doing. And many noncitizen immigrants
are exempted from the cutoffs: refugees, political asylum seekers, U.S.
military veterans, victims of domestic violence, children on food stamps
or SSI or immigrants employed in the U.S. for at least 10 years.
Source: Carl Horowitz, "Taking Welfare Reform to Court," Investor's
Business Daily, December 9, 1996.
|
Welfare for Legal Immigrants |
President Clinton and the nation's governors want to restore welfare
benefits to legal immigrants, a step opposed by some analysts.
Opponents of restoring federal funding of immigrant benefits make their
case in several ways.
Critics note that legal immigrants can retain their benefits simply by
becoming U. S. citizens.
Source: Carl Horowitz, "More Benefits for Immigrants?" Investor's
Business Daily, February 12, 1997.
|
States Thwart Immigrant Welfare Reforms |
Although Congress clearly intended to rein in welfare spending on legal
immigrants when it passed the welfare reform law last year, a number of
states and local jurisdictions are handing immigrants cash aid, challenging
the new law and helping them become citizens so they can continue to receive
benefits.
Every state but Alabama is providing benefits to families with children.
Most states are continuing to provide medical coverage, particularly to
children, and many are delaying cuts in food stamps which were scheduled
to begin in April.
President Clinton is also seeking $14.6 billion more for legal immigrants
over five years. Republican governors and representatives are also considering
higher aid levels.
Source: Richard Wolf, "States Taking Up Welfare Slack, USA Today,
March 24, 1997.
|
Welfare Reform and Immigrants |
The new welfare law is having an impact on noncitizens in at least two
areas: the number of those who are rushing to become citizens is soaring
and the proportion of Hispanics who work rose sharply late last year. Of
course, not all Hispanics are immigrants and not all immigrants are Hispanic;
but some analysts are convinced that the threat of a cut-off of benefits
is encouraging more to enter the workforce.
These new rules appear to have had an effect.
Recently, however, there have been rumblings at the federal and state
level of plans to restore some benefits to noncitizens. President Clinton
has put forward a plan to restore $14 billion in benefits for immigrants
over the next five years. Concurrent with reports of these initiatives,
the proportion of Hispanics entering the workforce has dropped somewhat
-- beginning early this year.
Critics of the plan argue that people respond to incentives, and that
the stick of impending poverty has put more people to work than the carrot
of job training and tax credits that have been tried and failed.
Source: Perspective, "Incentives Work," Investor's Business
Daily, April 25, 1997.
|
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA