
|
|
More taxpayers who aren't rich are declaring capital gains - (the profit when a financial asset or real estate is sold). Thus to an increasing extent, the benefits of a capital gains tax cut would go to lower and middle income groups. Taxpayers of more modest means have been investing in mutual funds - and individual stocks and bonds - at a fierce pace in recent years, according to studies by the Investment Company Institute.
Middle income families also invest in individual stocks.
The most widely-owned asset that creates capitla gains across all incomes classes is the home, according to Federal Reserve data. Most households in each income class - with the exception of those making less than $10,000 a year - owned a home in 1992. One problem in examining investment ownership on the basis of household income is that profits from the investments, themselves, help boost the income figures. Heritage Foundation economist William Beach has found that if the benefits of capital gains are subtracted from income reported by taxpayers in any given year, the benefits spread. Looking at 1992, he found that only 34 percent of all capital gains were reported by households with an income of $200,000 or more - once the income effect of the gains was taken out. So figures demonstrate that high capital gains tax rates soak middle class households as well as more wealthy ones. Under candidate Bob Dole's proposal to reduce capital gains tax rates, the rate for those earning below $40,100 a year would dip from 15 percent to 10.5 percent. Source: Laura M. Litvan, "Are Cap-Gains Cuts for the Rich?" Investor's BusinessDaily, September 5, 1996. |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA