
Tax | |
| April 1997 | |
Sales Tax Would Require High Rate |
Three new analyses by leading academic economists confirm that instituting
a national retail sales tax (NRST) to replace federal income taxes won't
work, says economist Bruce Bartlett. Congressmen Dan Schaefer (R-CO) and Billy Tauzin (R-LA) are expected
to reintroduce their proposal for a NRST just before the income tax deadline
on April 15. Schaefer and Tauzin have claimed that a 15 percent sales tax
rate would replace all federal taxes other than the Social Security payroll
tax; however, they assume that the federal government will pay sales taxes
on its own purchases without increasing its spending. Furthermore, Matthew Murray of the University of Tennessee in the March 1997 National
Tax Journal points out that state sales taxes appear to have high compliance
rates because their tax rates are much lower than this. Also, state compliance
rates are not at all comparable to a NRST, because states tax a much narrower
range of goods and services. He suggests that individuals could evade the
tax in various ways, such as disguising personal consumption as business
inputs, which would be free of tax. Mikesell also points out that no two states have the same tax bases for
their sales taxes, and none comes close to being comprehensive. Thus it
is impossible for the federal government simply to piggyback its tax collections
on state taxes without massive complexity. He concludes that "attempting
to levy a national sales tax as a supplement to state sales taxes would
be folly." Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis,
April 2, 1997. |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA