
International Policy | |
What Ails Africa? |
The Clinton administration is coming under fire for shying away from
criticizing African leaders out of fear of being branded "racist" and to avoid
offending black American voters. Some observers fear that the administration's timidity could cripple growth
prospects for that mineral-rich continent. Future growth, they say, will depend on
political stability and economic reform to attract investment.
Some African pro-democracy leaders and their black counterparts in the U.S. accuse mainstream black leaders here for making a bad situation in Africa even worse -- praising dictators there and giving bad advice to policymakers here. Critics advise the Clinton administration to condition U.S. aid programs -- including the proposed $650 million African Growth and Investment Opportunity Act -- on the establishment of strong, independent central banks, judicial reform, press freedom, and impartial and respected security forces. Others point out that past U.S. aid to African countries has more often than not been wasted or confiscated by African leaders. In view of these failures, they ask, why should the U.S. continue to pour resources into the continent? Source: George B.N. Ayittey (American University and the Free Africa Foundation), "African Thugs Keep Their Continent Poor," Wall Street Journal, January 2, 1998. |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA