
International Policy | |
The "Stockholm Syndrome" of Big Government |
For generations, Sweden was held up as a Social Democratic "middle
way" between Communism and Capitalism -- promising "cradle-to-
grave" social welfare benefits for everyone while a vigorous private sector paid the
bills. However, over the last 30 years the "Swedish model" has become
tarnished as Sweden's economy has declined, say observers. The reasons for Sweden's decline can be seen by contrasting it with another small
European country -- Switzerland. Both Sweden and Switzerland were neutrals in World
War II, both were independent countries for centuries, both have a highly educated
workforce, both are industrialized and technologically advanced, and both have export-
oriented economies.
Today taxes equal 55 percent of GDP in Sweden, compared to 33 percent for Switzerland. Observers say the increasing burden of government in Sweden is partly due to institutional factors. Unlike Switzerland, for instance, Sweden's government is highly centralized, contains few constitutional safeguards to protect property or individual rights, and is based on simple majority-rule in its one-chamber national parliament. Because of the difficulty in changing government policies, say observers, international businesses based in Sweden and wealthy individuals facing effective income tax rates above 100 percent simply leave the country. Source: Nils-Eric Sandberg, "What Went Wrong In Sweden?" (Stockholm: AB Timbro, 1997). |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA