Crime And Gun Control

Time, Expense Of Court Trials Boosts Arbitration

A recent survey by the National Center for State Courts showed that faith in the U.S. court system was waning.

  • More than 80 percent of respondents believe politics influences court decisions.

  • The same number believe the wealthy get preference in court decisions, and cases take too long to settle.

  • Two-thirds believe they can afford to take a case to court.

  • Almost 70 percent of blacks says they fail to get equal treatment from the courts.

The expense of trying a case and the amount of time it usually takes have caused many people to avoid the courts altogether and use an arbitrator. Arbitration hearings are more informal and consumer-friendly than a court trial, observers say, and according to the National Arbitration Forum, litigating through arbitration costs about 10 percent of a court hearing. An independent arbitrator reviews documents from both sides, perhaps holds a hearing, then renders a decision.

Arbitration is becoming more popular. In 1994, 59,424 arbitration or mediation cases were filed; in 1998, the number had climbed to 95,143.

Source: Dick Thornburgh (U.S. Attorney General under presidents Reagan and Bush), "Zap Some Lawyers: Go For Arbitration," USA Today, October 6, 1999.

For more on Privatization & Justice http://www.ncpa.org/pi/crime/crime61.html#A


Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us

Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA