
Regulation Issues | |
Price Caps Preferable To Guaranteed Profits |
State policymakers are facing crucial choices regarding the regulation of telecommunications, say analysts. Traditionally, local telephone services have been regulated to ensure a "fair" profit above their costs. This system is commonly known as "rate-of-return" regulation. This creates perverse incentives for a firm to increase its costs and pass them on to consumers. But state regulators are using alternative methods in which prices -- rather than profits -- are regulated, giving providers an incentive to increase efficiency and lower costs. Commonly known as "incentive regulation," it usually takes the form of a price cap. Price cap regulation was first applied to the newly privatized British Telecom in 1984.
Academic studies suggest price caps do not harm service quality and improve many measures of success. Chunrong Ai and David E.M. Sappington conclude that:
Initial price caps are either frozen or periodically adjusted, based on an inflation index, and often a "productivity factor." Under a price cap system, inefficient firms make a lower profit than they would under a rate-of-return system. Source: Kent Lassman, "A Primer on Price Cap Regulation," Issue Analysis No. 85, February 25, 1999, Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation, 1250 H Street, N.W., Suite 700, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 783-3870. For more on Telephony http://www.ncpa.org/pd/regulat/reg-9.html |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA