Privatization

Amtrak's Sorry Track Record

Amtrak could face strike threats from a dozen unions in the next three to four years. The extra wage demands could cost nearly $500 million over the next five years. Amtrak's many critics say the national rail-passenger service isn't worth that cost and isn't worth saving.

Here are some of their reasons:

  • They charge that Amtrak has resorted to a financial shell game in order to claim that its annual operating subsidy is dropping -- although its capital budget is rising.

  • One of its trains operates on a slower schedule than privately run services did in 1941.

  • Amtrak subsidies are primarily supported by politicians from states having Amtrak services who are simply out to protect constituents' jobs.

According to the General Accounting Office, five of Amtrak's 44 routes -- in the Northeast and Southern California -- account for more than half of all riders, 56 percent of revenues and just 40 percent of costs. Analysts frequently suggest these routes be privatized. Other regional trains -- such as Los Angeles-San Diego and Chicago-Milwaukee -- could be run locally.

Long-distance trains would disappear as scheduled services. Some experts suggest they be privatized into "rolling National Parks" which could be run profitably by private operators.

Proponents of privatization say these ideas are patterned on the rail privatization and regionalization programs now underway in 40 countries -- including Argentina, Britain, Japan and New Zealand. They would like to see Congress create an independent Amtrak Transition Board to sell or convey Amtrak assets to private companies and regional bodies.

Source: Joseph Vranich, "Amtrak: Chugging Toward Oblivion," Wall Street Journal, November 5, 1997.


Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA