ADA FAILS TO DEFINE "DISABILITY"
The 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) failed to define
what a "disability" is, leaving interpretation to the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, other regulatory agencies
and the courts. As a result, businesses are confused -- unsure
when they are, or are not, complying with the law. (The ADA does
list a few conditions that don't count -- transvestitism, kleptomania
and pyromania, for example.)
Does an employer who dismisses an employee for missing too much
time from work because of a chronic illness violate the law?
- More than half of the 58,735 charges filed between July 1992
and December 1995 were for discharges or layoffs.
- Only 10 percent claimed discrimination in hiring, and just
over one-fourth were complaints about lack of accommodation.
- Harassing the disabled was cited in 11 percent of the filings,
even though it is not covered by the law.
Disabilities which can be hidden from employers -- such as back
pain -- account for almost half of ADA complaints. On the other
hand, hearing, vision and mobility problems have been cited only
14 percent of the time.
In some cases, ADA requirements conflict with other workplace
laws, such as the Family and Medical Leave Act and parts of the
National Labor Relations Act. Following one law could land an
employer into trouble with the other. Another problem: the EEOC
tends to view complaints on a case-by-case basis, making it difficult
for companies to know how the agency will judge their actions.
Source: John Merline, "Firms Still Facing Gray Areas in Disabilities
Act Rules," Investor's Business Daily, March 5, 1996.
ADA'S UNINTENTIONAL RESULTS
Like many another well-meaning but poorly-thought-out legislative
initiatives, the Americans with Disabilities Act is generating
some strange administrative problems.
- The YMCA is being sued for $20 million by a "profoundly"
deaf lifeguard after the organization decreed that lifeguards
must be able to hear noises and distress signals, then dismissed
him.
- To comply with the act, many states and localities have had
to change their hiring requirements for police officers, establishing
"sliding scale" physical fitness tests to accommodate
older and female applicants.
- After the National Collegiate Athletic Association revised
its regulations to cease recruiting high school athletes unprepared
for college work, the Justice Department threatened suit -- alleging
discrimination against students with learning disabilities who
haven't taken college preparatory courses.
- A group of deaf people in Cleveland unsuccessfully sued the
National Football League, claiming that the "blackout rule"
-- which prohibits television broadcasts of home football games
that are not sold-out at least 72 hours in advance -- violated
the rights of the hearing impaired.
Critics of the ADA say they are concerned that it turns disabilities
into prized legal assets and creates a powerful incentive to maximize
the number of Americans who claim to be disabled.
Source: James Bovard (Future of Freedom Foundation), "Disability
Intentions Astray," Washington Times, May 20, 1996.
ADA RESULTS IN ABSURB CLAIMS
The 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) has turned disabilities into
valuable legal assets, encouraging tens of thousands of lawsuits against
private companies and municipalities.
The ADA defines a disability vaguely as a physical or mental impairment
that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of a
person. While well intentioned, ADA has led to absurd claims for special
accommodation of behaviors or personal characteristics. Some examples:
- A clerk-typist fired from her county job after repeated rude outbursts
and loud denunciations of her supervisors sued, claiming that she was a
manic-depressive and her employer was obliged to alleviate job stress.
- A 360-pound Tennessee woman sued a movie theater chain for $1.5 million
for emotional distress when none of the theater seats was large enough to
accommodate her and they wouldn't let her use her own chair.
- A Tampa, Florida man fired after bringing a loaded gun into the office
sued because he claimed to have a chemical imbalance and didn't remember
bringing the weapon to work.
- A motorist in Topeka, Kansas sued the city after receiving tickets
for speeding and not wearing a seat belt, claiming he could not wear the
belt because of claustrophobia.
- A Boston University professor who allegedly sexually assaulted another
teacher and harassed three students blamed his antidepressant medication
for loosening his inhibitions and is suing, claiming he was fired due to
his mental handicap.
- A man awarded damages for permanent disability from the Santa Fe Railway
is suing the railroad for refusing to rehire him when he sought to return
to work eight days later.
Source: James Bovard, "A Law That Is Disabling Our Courts," Reader's
Digest, October 1995.
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2000 NCPA