
Government And Politics | |
The Political Consequences Of Stock Ownership |
In 1980, about one-third of all housing in Britain was owned by the state. Conservative British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's sale of government-owned housing directly to the tenants was wildly popular, and created a profound change in political attitudes. Once workers became homeowners, they ceased being wards of the state. Suddenly, they became very concerned about property taxes and government policies that affected property values. Thus, millions of Labor Party voters found themselves sympathetic to the Conservative Party's message. In time, even the Labor Party was forced to move well to the right of its previous hard-core socialism. Now, something similar is happening in America due to growing stock ownership.
A key reason for growth in equity ownership has been the widespread growth of defined-contribution pension plans, such as 401(k)s, in which workers invest for their own retirement, rather than receiving a fixed monthly pension from their employer. This growth in stock ownership may already be affecting political attitudes. According to Rasmussen Research, those who own at least $5,000 of stock are more likely to vote Republican than Democrat.
Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, November 8, 1999. For text http://www.ncpa.org/oped/bartlett/bartlett99.html For ICI/SIA study http://www.ici.org/pdf/rpt_equity_owners.pdf For Gallup Poll http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr991029b.asp For more on the Effects of Politics on Public Policy http://www.ncpa.org/pd/govern/govern9.html |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA