
Government and Politics | |
Campaign Fund May Fall Short |
The proportion of taxpayers agreeing to channel $3 of their tax payments to presidential campaigns is dwindling, according to the Federal Election Commission. As a result, the FEC is warning that it may not have enough money for candidates in presidential primaries in 2000.
The agency first sets aside funds for the general election campaigns of the two major parties, as well as funds for which Ross Perot's Reform Party has qualified. Next, it must earmark about $14 million to pay for the Republican and Democratic national conventions. Only whatever is left can be used for the primaries.
The FEC estimates only about $25 million will be available for the primaries and there could be as many as a dozen presidential candidates.
Under complicated rules, candidates who agree to abide by spending limits get FEC matching funds. Observers say that, given the shortage of public funds, candidates may choose to opt out of the arrangement -- precipitating a campaign-spending free-for-all.
The 1996 election campaigns were the most expensive in history, according to a study by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Sources: Reuters, "Public Willingness to Fund Campaigns Faltering, FEC Says," Washington Times, and Jill Abramson, "'96 Campaign Costs Set Record at $2.2 Billion," New York Times, both November 25, 1997.
|
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us
Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA