Opinion Editorial

Monday, September 14, 1998  

Long-Term Stock Yields Impressive

Recent wild gyrations in the stock market have given ulcers to many stock market professionals. Average investors, however, have largely remained calm. Indeed, rather than selling in a panic, as many of the pros did, the amateurs saw the stock market's fall as a buying opportunity. And they were rewarded last week when the market unexpectedly rebounded.

What this illustrates is the importance of taking a long-term view toward investing. On a day-to-day basis the stock market moves up and down for reasons that are unfathomable. One can read analyses in the next day's paper attributing the market's moves to some economic statistic or other factor. But in truth, these are usually after-the-fact rationalizations for actions that in reality are incomprehensible.

However, while the market's short-term fluctuations often make no sense, its long-term movements are in fact perfectly predictable. In the long-run the stock market reflects the profitability of American corporations, which in turn are a function of productivity and growth in the economy.

The historical record indicates that over time investments in stocks have been extremely profitable.

  • On average, large company stocks have achieved a total return (dividends plus capital appreciation) of 13 percent per year.

  • Small company stocks have done even better, giving investors a total return of 17.7 percent per year.

One reason for these high returns is that investors must take risks. Some stocks go up a lot, others go bust; some years the stock market skyrockets, others it tanks. In down times, the price of taking risk can be painful. But there are compensating rewards over time. The most risk-free investment one can make is in U.S. Treasury bills and the return on these has been just 3.8 percent per year, barely above the inflation rate. Investing in Treasury bonds gave investors 5.6 percent on their investments.

What happens when you translate these different rates of return into actual investments? A $1 investment in small company stocks in 1925 would have risen to $5,520 by 1997 (see figure). The same investment made in 1950 would have risen to $636 and one made in 1975 would have increased to $51. This is about twice as well as one could do investing in large company stocks. The reason is that small company stocks are riskier. But over time any investment in stocks will typically exceed those on bonds by many times.

Wise investors will resist the temptation to avoid risk and recognize that higher long-run returns will compensate. Especially for the young, stocks are still the way to go.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, September 14, 1998.



Home |  Support Us |  All Issues |  Social Security
Debate Central |  Contact Us