Opinion Editorial

Monday, October 12, 1998  

Rich Pay More Taxes

A few days ago, the Census Bureau released the latest data on income distribution in the U.S. At about the same time, the Internal Revenue Service released new data on taxes paid by the wealthy. Together, these two reports explain a great deal about where the budget surplus came from.

According to the Census Bureau, the rich have gotten richer faster during the Clinton Administration than at any time in history. In 1992, the share of total income going to the top five percent of households was 18.6 percent. By 1997, this figure jumped to 21.7 percent. This represents a much larger increase in just five years than occurred during all eight years of the Reagan Administration (see figure). However, while the increasing share of income going to the richest Americans was a constant topic of press interest in the 1980s, it is utterly ignored today.

There is a benefit to this trend and that is the increasing share of income taxes paid by the wealthy.

  • In 1992, the top five percent of taxpayers paid 46 percent of all federal income taxes.

  • In 1996, the latest year available, this same group paid 51 percent of all income taxes.

  • If their share of federal income taxes had remained unchanged over this period, the top five percent of taxpayers would have paid $32 billion less in taxes in 1996 than they did.

Not only did the wealthy increase their share of total taxes, they also increased the percentage of their income paid in taxes. In 1992, the top five percent of taxpayers had an effective tax rate of 21.15 percent (taxes as a share of income). By 1996, this figure had increased to 23.88 percent. If this group had continued to pay taxes in 1996 at their 1992 tax rate, they would have paid $38 billion less taxes than they did.

During the 1980s, the rising share of income going to the wealthy was assumed to be the result of lower taxes. The fact that the Census Bureau's income figures are calculated on a before-tax basis did not seem to matter. Yet during this period we also saw the rich raising their share of federal income taxes. The share paid by the top five percent of taxpayers, for example, rose from 36.8 percent in 1980 to 45.5 percent in 1988.

Of course, just because one group's share of the pie is getting bigger does not necessarily mean that anyone else is worse off, because the pie itself has become larger. Indeed, the real median income of every income class has in fact risen even as income inequality has grown. Thus even though the rich have gotten richer, so has everyone else.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, October 12, 1998.




Home |  Support Us |  All Issues |  Social Security
Debate Central |  Contact Us