Opinion Editorial

Monday, July 6, 1998  

Questions Remain About Budget Forecasts

Many Republicans believe that the main barrier to enactment of a large tax cut this year is the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), because it is low-balling its forecast of future federal revenues. They think revenues next year will come in substantially higher than CBO is predicting, allowing for a significantly larger tax cut than Congress is currently contemplating, without endangering the balanced budget. They note that last year CBO underestimated federal revenues by $72 billion and they suspect revenues may be underestimated by a similar magnitude this year.

On June 23, CBO Director June O'Neill responded to her critics in a letter to House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.). She argued that everyone, not just the CBO, underestimated revenues last year. O'Neill pointed out that CBO's deficit forecasts were close to those made by the Office of Management and Budget and private forecasters. In short, CBO did as well as economic science allowed and should not be singled out for blame when no one else did much better.

This is a strong argument. Nevertheless, CBO's estimate of future revenues does seem to be unusually conservative. CBO is predicting that revenues will grow more slowly than gross domestic product (GDP) over the next decade (see figure). Generally, because our tax system is progressive, revenues grow faster than GDP.

  • Throughout the postwar period revenues grew by 0.6 percent per year more than GDP.

  • In the last 10 years, revenues grew even faster -- 0.9 percent more than GDP.

  • If CBO's GDP estimate is correct, one would ordinarily expect between 5.2 and 5.5 percent growth in future revenues, rather than the 4.5 percent growth that is projected.

Mrs. O'Neill does not give a satisfactory explanation for why revenues are expected to grow so much more slowly than they have grown historically. Her main point seems to be that there is bound to be a recession some time in the next decade and that this will cause revenue growth to slow. But the impact of past recessions is already incorporated into the historical data on growth of actual revenues. So it seems odd for the CBO in effect to predict a future recession will have an impact on revenues much greater than those in the past.

No one is suggesting that the CBO is deliberately fudging its numbers for some political purpose. However, Congress is entitled to raise questions about the accuracy of the numbers it must rely upon when making important decisions about taxing and spending. The questions that have been raised about CBO's revenue forecasts are legitimate and deserve a better response than it has provided.

Source: Bruce Bartlett, senior fellow, National Center for Policy Analysis, July 6, 1998.



Home |  Support Us |  All Issues |  Social Security
Debate Central |  Contact Us