NCPA


Policy Issues

NCPA Publications

Both Sides

Editorial Opinions

Audio/Visual



NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
HOME / DONATE / ONE LEVEL UP / ABOUT NCPA / CONTACT US
Problems With Single-Payer Health Insurance
Daily Policy Digest

Health Issues / Assumptions Behind Health Care Reform

Monday, April 22, 2002
Although Americans soundly rejected "socialized medicine" back in 1993, when the Clinton administration proposed wholesale changes in the health care industry, former Delaware Gov. Pete du Pont says self-appointed health care advocates are pushing incremental steps toward national health insurance.

National health insurance is socialized medicine -- but proponents are using a less threatening term: "single-payer system." In theory, a single-payer system would reduce the number of different organizations with which physicians and hospitals must file claims. Many public health advocates assume the administrative savings would be sufficient to fund coverage for the uninsured. Likewise, consumer groups would like to pocket any savings in the form of lower premiums. Yet the truth is there will be no "savings" to fight over.

In all single-payer systems, consumers are insulated from the direct cost of health care because it is paid for through taxation. Consequently, they tend to consume more. Single-payer systems employ several tactics to artificially reduce consumption, including outright rationing of care, shortchanging capital investment, and reducing the number of physicians.

  • To adopt a single-payer system with resource allocation similar to Canada, for instance, the U.S. would have to fire around 171,000 physicians.
  • The remaining doctors would have to see, on average, 921 additional patients per year to match the average number of patients seen by Canadian physicians -- likely reducing the length of time physicians spend with patients.
  • Furthermore, long waits would be required -- in 1999, for example, the median wait for a CT scan and an MRI across Canada was five weeks and 12 weeks, respectively.
Finally, as a monopoly, a single-payer system can reduce funding for particular services or refuse to cover services deemed too expensive. Consumers would have to accept whatever costs and benefits were offered.

Source: Pete du Pont (NCPA policy chairman), "Single-Payer Health Care By Any Other Name Is Still A Monopoly," April 2, 2002.

For text
http://www.ncpa.org/edo/pd/2002/pd040202.html

For more on Assumptions Behind Health Care Reform
http://www.ncpa.org/iss/hea


12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
601 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 900 South Building - Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
Copyright © 2002 National Center for Policy Analysis - All rights reserved.