
|
|
Despite get-tough laws on juvenile crime in many jurisdictions, the vast majority of teen-age criminals still get no punishment or supervision either in the adult or juvenile system, according to criminal expert John J. DiIuilo Jr. Moreover, prosecutors and probation officers still are fighting uphill battles against undue legal burdens. DiIulio also contends that even long prison terms -- while cutting crime rates -- do not deter the worst young thugs.
As an example of the obstacles facing juvenile prosecutors, consider the case of the 14-year-old repeat offender in Indiana. After he was charged in 1996 with strangling a 69-year-old neighbor, robbing her and stealing her car, his lawyers fought for months after the boy had confessed to keep his case out of an adult court -- arguing that he had cried about his crimes. Although prosecutors finally won a waiver to allow him to be tried as an adult, they had to persevere though months of paperwork. Harvard economist Steven Levitt claims that between 1978 and 1993, the juvenile justice system became less, not more, punitive relative to the adult system. He calculates that had the juvenile system increased at the rate that the adult system during that period, the juvenile violent crime rate would have risen by 74 percent rather than 107 percent. Source: John J. DiIulio (Princeton), "Jail Alone Won't Stop Juvenile Super-Predators," Wall Street Journal, June 11, 1997. |
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact UsDallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA