
Are synthetic chemicals disrupting human reproduction and development? Some environmentalists have suggested that certain man-made chemicals in the human diet might be causing lower male sperm counts. These chemicals, called endocrine disrupters, mimic or affect hormones involved in reproduction, such as estrogen.
However, naturally occurring substances in the human diet are far more potent endocrine disrupters than the synthetic compounds most closely identified with reproductive health concerns, such as DDT and PCBs.
Effects on reproduction have been observed outside the laboratory when a large part of the diet consists of a food containing unusually high levels of a natural endocrine disrupter. For example, in the 1940s, many Australian sheep became infertile from grazing on a species of clover that produces estrogen-like chemicals.
Most claims about lower human sperm counts are from a now-discredited statistical study. U.S. data collected from 1938 to 1977 show no decline in sperm counts, and there is evidence that counts have actually increased in the last 25 years. Also, U.S. rates of infertility have remained constant for 30 years. Thus the evidence is that neither natural nor synthetic compounds in food are threatening human reproductive health.
Source: Jonathan Tolman, "Nature's Hormone Factory: Endocrine Disrupters in the Natural Environment," March 1996, Competitive Enterprise Institute, 1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1250, Washington, DC 20036, (202) 331-1010.
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact UsDallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA