NCPA


Punishment Works

Nationally, the crime rate has dropped 8 percent over the last three years. This overall decrease is due in large part to dramatic drops in crime in those states that have increased prison capacity and tightened guidelines for parole, thereby increasing the length of time criminals spend behind bars.

Texas, which suffered from a 29 percent increase in the rate of serious crime during the 1980s, is a good example of the dramatic improvement in the 1990s:

Another reason why Texas prisoners are spending more time in prison is that far fewer prisoners considered for parole are actually paroled. In 1990, 79.4 percent of prisoners considered for parole received approval, whereas in 1994 only 22.3 percent received approval.

Primarily because of the longer sentences actually served per crime, expected punishment in Texas has risen in recent years. Expected punishment is the amount of prison time criminals can expect to serve, given the probabilities of being apprehended, convicted and sent to prison and given the median sentences served per crime.

Despite these improvements, Texas still has a serious crime problem. More than 250,000 Texans are victims of violent crimes each year and more than 2 million are victims of property crime.

Source:: Morgan O. Reynolds, "Crime and Punishment in Texas: Update," NCPA Policy Report No. 202, January 1996, National Center for Policy Analysis, 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75251, (972) 386-6272.

ea mj 96o


Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact Us

Dallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA