
Among both opponents and proponents of favorable tax treatment for Individual Retirement Accounts, many believe that such accounts reduce tax revenue for the government. They reason that if the government gives people a tax deduction for an IRA deposit, the government then collects less tax revenue than otherwise. Their reasoning is incomplete and in most cases incorrect.
First, the government gets much of the original tax revenue, as well as revenue on the earnings of the IRA, when the individual withdraws the funds. Second, contributions to IRAs increase investment in capital formation, which leads to increased corporate taxes. Taking account of both factors, IRAs are likely to decrease the government's debt.
To create an IRA program that did not lose revenue even in the first year, the government need only replace the current program with one for which contributions are not tax-deductible but all funds are withdrawn tax-free.
Source: Martin Feldstein, "The Effects of Tax-Based Saving Incentives on Government Revenue and National Saving," Working Paper No. 4021, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, (617) 868-3900.
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact UsDallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA