
Secretary of Labor Robert Reich, calling for an increase in the federally mandated minimum wage, claims that nearly two-thirds of minimum wage workers are adults and that more than one-third are their families' sole breadwinners. In fact, however, most of those earning the minimum wage are not poor and most of the poor are not working.
Although the higher federal minimum wage proposed by President Clinton would do little to abolish poverty, it would cause real hardship for some low-income Americans, the very people it is designed to help. A large majority of scholarly studies demonstrate that increasing the federal minimum wage causes higher unemployment. Those who suffer are most likely to be teenagers, racial minorities and low-skilled workers.
An increase in the minimum wage would also shock the labor market and might trigger a recession, especially since this is a time of economic uncertainty. In the past, increases in the minimum wage have triggered recessions or prolonged depressions. For example:
The higher unemployment rate in the recessions of 1990-91 and 1974-75 helps explain why, over the past two decades, the poverty rate rose in the year after the completion of each minimum wage increase.
In short, the evidence suggests that raising the minimum wage would not reduce poverty, would increase unemployment among the most disadvantaged groups in American society and would increase the probability of a recession within a year.
Source: Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway, "Should the Federal Minimum Wage Be Increased?" NCPA Policy Report No. 190, February 1995, National Center for Policy Analysis, 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75251, (972) 386-6272.
Home | Support Us | All Issues | Social Security | Debate Central | Contact UsDallas Headquarters: 12770 Coit Rd., Suite 800 - Dallas, TX 75251-1339 - 972/386-6272 - Fax 972/386-0924
Washington Office: 601 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900 South Building, Washington, DC 20004 - 202/220-3082 - Fax 202/220-3096
© 2001 NCPA